Walthall v. State, 46257
| Decision Date | 20 December 1972 |
| Docket Number | No. 46257,46257 |
| Citation | 488 S.W.2d 453 |
| Parties | Michael WALTHALL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. |
| Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
Carol S. Vance, Dist. Atty. and James C. Brough, Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston, Jim D. Vollers, State's Atty., and Robert A. Huttash, Asst. State's Atty., Austin, for the State.
This is an appeal from a conviction for the possession of marihuana. The jury assessed the punishment at three years.
The record reflects that officers pursued the Volkswagen that the appellant was driving on Westheimer Street in Houston at approximately forty-five miles an hour in a thirty mile an hour zone. When the officers stopped the appellant one of them saw a sawed-off shotgun between the bucket seats of the car. During the search of the appellant the officers found a prescription bottle or vial which contained a small amount of marihuana. One of the officers found a paper bag under the seat of the car. It contained approximately a pound of marihuana. A woman passenger in the car was not charged with an offense.
The appellant had counsel during the trial, but no brief was filed on appeal. Apparently counsel was retained. There is no indication of indigency in the record. The appellant is on bail.
In the interest of justice under Article 40.09, Section 13, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P., we will discuss the legality of the search which was apparently the only contested issue during the trial.
Before the officers stopped the appellant, he was speeding. In Smoot v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 475 S.W.2d 281, the defendant was exceeding a thirty mile limit and slid his tires in approaching an intersection. Upon the approach of an officer, he appeared excited. The officer saw a rusty hunting knife and a box of cigarettes. The officer seized both and found nine marihuana cigarettes. This Court held the arrest and search legal.
Byrd v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 447 S.W.2d 936, held where the original arrest was legal an officer is authorized to make an additional arrest for any other offense discovered during the course of the investigation and the evidence obtained is admissible. See Grego v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 456 S.W.2d 123.
In Breckenridge v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 460 S.W.2d 907, the arrest was for speeding. As the officer approached he saw a shotgun under the front seat. This Court held a complete search of the car was authorized.
In the present case the shotgun was sawed-off, but not enough to make its possession...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Lackey v. State
...State, 548 S.W.2d 44; Young v. State, 447 S.W.2d 911; and even when no brief was filed at all. Kaser v. State, 505 S.W.2d 806; Walthall v. State, 488 S.W.2d 453. In several cases consideration of the search and seizure issue in the interest of justice and independently of any ground of erro......
-
Williams v. State, 49498
...ineffective assistance of counsel; Hartman v. State, 496 S.W.2d 582 (Tex.Cr.App.1973) pro se brief of appellant; Walthall v. State, 488 S.W.2d 453 (Tex.Cr.App.1972) legality of search; Dorsey v. State, 485 S.W.2d 569 (Tex.Cr.App.1972) voluntariness of confession; Sanders v. State, 482 S.W.2......
-
Sheldon v. State, 48166
...the driver of the van as a traffic violator without a warrant. Article 6701d, Sections 68, 153, Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. In Walthall v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 488 S.W.2d 453, where officer observed a shotgun between seats of a car stopped for speeding, this Court held that even though the shotgun ......
-
Colston v. State
...the open door of the van. When the officers spotted the pistol in the van a further search of the van was authorized. Walthall v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 488 S.W.2d 453, citing with approval Breckenridge v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 460 S.W.2d 907. See Taylor v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 420 S.W.2d The sub......