Waltham Watch Co. v. Keene

Decision Date15 February 1913
Citation202 F. 225
PartiesWALTHAM WATCH CO. v. KEENE.
CourtU.S. District Court — Southern District of New York

Crawford Harris & Goodwin, of New York City (Matthews, Thompson &amp Spring, of Boston, Mass., of counsel), for complainant.

Adolph Hirsch Rosenfeld, of New York City, for defendant.

RAY District Judge.

The parties by stipulation have agreed upon the facts, which in condensed form may be stated as follows:

I. The Waltham Watch Company is a corporation of the state of Massachusetts having its place of manufacture of watch movements, etc., and its principal place of business at Waltham in that state, and the defendant, Charles A. Keene is a citizen of the state of New York, engaged in the business of buying and selling watches and watch movements etc., in the city of New York, state of New York.

II. The complainant is the sole owner of United States letters patent No. 527,771, to one Church for improvement in watch movement frames, United States letters patent No. 677,689, to one Ohlson, assignor to the Waltham Watch Company, for improvement in spring barrels for watch movements, and United States letters patent No. 556,303, to one Church for improvement in dial holders for watch movements, and has been since May 15, 1906. The said letters patents are good and valid, and the several inventions set forth in said letters patents are capable of conjoint use and have been so used by the Waltham Watch Company, and watch movements made and put out by said Waltham Watch Company, since May 15, 1906, and known as '16 size Riverside Movements,' have each embodied conjointly the inventions described in said patents. The inventions embodied in the improvements constitute a material and substantial feature thereof.

III. Subdivisions 11 to 16, inclusive, of the stipulated record, read as follows:

'(11) Among the watch movements manufactured by the complainant since the said 15th day of May, 1906, and for a long time prior thereto by the complainant's said predecessor, is and has been a model distinguished by the trade-mark 'Riverside.' Said trade-mark Riverside has been continuously, uninterruptedly, and exclusively used by the complainant and its said predecessor since October, 1876, and has been stamped or engraved in a conspicuous place on all such movements. Said watch movements so distinguished by the trade-mark Riverside have been during the whole of said period manufactured by the complainant and complainant's said predecessor in several sizes, one of said size being known as the 16 size Riverside movement, and containing 19 jewels. Said trade-mark Riverside has at all times since the 15th day of April, 1907, and for a long time prior thereto, been and is duly registered with the Commissioner of Patents of the United States, said registration being in all respects in compliance with the laws of the United States in that respect made and provided. A copy of said registration is hereto annexed and marked 'D.'
'(12) Since said 15th day of April, 1907, many watch movements bearing said trade-mark Riverside and known to the watch trade and to the public as Riverside watch movements, including many of said 16 size Riverside movements, have been sold and used in said Southern district of New York and elsewhere.
'(13) Since the said 15th day of April, 1907, all watch movements herein referred to as 16 size Riverside movements, and which have embodied and embody conjointly the inventions and improvements set forth in said three letters patent, as well as other movements made by the complainant and embodying other patented inventions and improvements, have been sold and delivered by the complainant at its regular established price only to wholesale dealers, known as jobbers, and by said jobbers to retail dealers, only in the following manner:
'All of said movements have been sold and delivered in boxes or packages, one movement in each box or package, each movement being inclosed in an inner metal box or container. Accompanying each movement and inserted in direct contact therewith in said metal box or container is a printed slip designated 'waltham Contract Notice,' and in the case of each and every one of said 16 size Riverside movements embodying the said inventions made by the complainant, and which has since the said 15th day of April, 1907, been purchased by the defendant, the box or package containing such movements, when received by the defendant, as the defendant then well knew, also contained, as aforesaid, said Waltham Contract Notice, of which the following is a true copy, the blank space after the words 'movement No.' containing the number corresponding with the number on the movement it accompanied:
"Waltham Contract Notice.
"16 size Waltham movement No. bearing the trade-mark Riverside 19 jewels, essential parts of which are protected by United States letters patent, is sold subject to the following conditions, which every buyer thereof by accepting this movement agrees with the undersigned company to keep and perform, viz.: (1) Jobbers may sell this movement to established retail watch dealers, except those designated by this company, and to no other persons, and only at the price and discount authorized by this company. (The term 'retail watch dealers' shall include all watch dealers other than those recognized as jobbers by this company.) (2) Jobbers must in every instance deliver this contract notice with the movement. (3) Retail dealers may dispose of this movement by sale only, and only to buyers for use and

not for resale and must not advertise nor sell this movement for less than $25.00. A breach of any of these conditions shall revest in the company the title to this movement and upon tendering the price paid therefor to the holder thereof the company may retake possession of the same.

"These conditions will be enforced by the company.

"Waltham Watch Company, "Waltham, Mass.'
'Said contract notice being a true copy of the notice so used from April 15, 1907, down to the present time, excepting that on the 23d day of September, 1909, the price specified in said contract notice was changed from $25 to $28.50. The form of said box or package containing said 16 size Riverside movements being identical in every respect with the box marked 'Exhibit E,' which is hereby made a part of this stipulation and is filed herewith.
'Subsequent to the 15th day of April, 1907, in each instance where any of the said 16 size Riverside movements have been sold or furnished by the complainant or under its authority to jobbers, there has been annexed to or printed on the invoice rendered by the complainant to such jobbers in a conspicuous place a notice designated 'Conditions of Sale (Bill to Jobbers), ' of which the following is a true copy, except that certain movements enumerated therein other than the said Riverside movements were not included in the notice issued on April 15, 1907, but were added thereto after said April 15, 1907; said Riverside movements having at all times been included in said notice:
"Conditions of Sale.
"(Bill to Jobbers.)
"Each Waltham movement and Waltham watch in this bill is sold subject to the following conditions and to those in the Waltham Contract Notice issued with the movement or watch, which conditions every buyer thereof by accepting said movement or watch agrees with the undersigned company to keep and perform, viz.: (1) Jobbers may sell said movements or watches, to established retail watch dealers, except those designated company and to no other persons, and only at prices and discounts authorized by the said company. (2) Must bill said movements or watches only on billheads approved by said company and bearing the Condition of Sale. (3) Must not bill said movements or watches with any other goods. (4) Must not exchange said movements or watches for any other goods whatsoever. (5) The Waltham Contract Notice must be delivered with the movement or watch in every instance. These conditions govern the sale of the following movements; Vanguard, 18 size and 16 size; Crescent St., 18 size and 16 size; No. 845; Appleton, Tracy & Co., Premier; Riverside Maximus, 16 size, 12 size and 0 size; Riverside, 16 size, 12 size and 0 size; No. 645; Royal, 16 size and 12 size; all Colonial Series watches. (6) A breach of any of said conditions shall revest in the company the title to all movements of the grades named and all Colonial Series watches in the possession of the violator and of any one who shall have induced or knowingly participated in such breach; and upon tendering the price paid by the holder of such movements or watches the company may retake possession of the same. (7) Jobbers must immediately send to the company's selling agents a duplicate of every bill of the above-named movements and watches which they issue.
"The undersigned will enforce these conditions.
"Waltham Watch Company, "Waltham, Mass.'
'On the 15th day of April, 1907, the complainant established a schedule of retail prices, relating to said 16 size Riverside movements made by the complainant, which prices were contained on a printed slip or form designated 'Conditions of Sale (Bill to Retailers), of which the following is a true copy: "Conditions of Sale.

"(Bill to Retailers.)

"Each Waltham movement specified in this bill is sold subject to the following conditions and to those of the Waltham Contract Notice issued with the movement, which conditions every buyer thereof by accepting said movement agrees with the undersigned company to keep and perform: (1) All watch dealers are to be considered retail dealers, except those recognized as jobbers by said company. (2) Retail dealers may dispose of said movements by sale only and only to buyers for use and not for resale....

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • State on Information of Dalton v. Miles Laboratories
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 10 Octubre 1955
    ...v. Federal Trade Commission, 2 Cir., 4 F.2d 910, 912(2), certiorari denied 267 U.S. 602, 45 S.Ct. 462, 69 L.Ed. 808; Waltham Watch Co. v. Keene, D.C.N.Y., 202 F. 225, 234(2), affirmed without opinion 2 Cir., 209 F. 1007, certiorari denied 232 U.S. 724, 34 S.Ct. 602, 58 L.Ed. 815; Kellogg To......
  • Bayonne Textile Corp. v. Am. Fed'n of Silk Workers
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • 4 Mayo 1934
    ...power, except upon the most cogent evidence. Jersey City Gaslight Co. v. Consumers Gas Co., 40 N. J. Eq. 427, 2 A. 622; Waltham Watch Co. v. Keene (D. C.) 202 F. 225, 241, affirmed (C. C. A.) 209 F. 1007, certiorari denied, 232 U. S. 724, 34 S. Ct. 602, 58 L. Ed. 815. The natural import of ......
  • Ford Motor Co. v. Union Motor Sales Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Ohio
    • 4 Diciembre 1914
    ... ... a less price than the list price? See opinion of Judge Ray in ... Waltham Watch Co. v. Keene (D.C.) 202 F. 225, 234, ... There ... are cases sustaining such ... ...
  • Colavito v. New York Organ Donor Network, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • 15 Febrero 2005
    ...of a statute is ambiguous, the court should avoid a construction that would be contrary to public policy. See Waltham Watch Co. v. Keene, 202 F. 225, 242 (S.D.N.Y.1913). As discussed in Part IV, supra, the narrow rights in a deceased's body are reserved exclusively for the next of kin and o......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT