Walton Bank & Trust Co. v. Carpenter
Decision Date | 21 November 1924 |
Citation | 205 Ky. 629 |
Parties | Walton Bank and Trust Company v. Carpenter, et al. |
Court | Kentucky Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Boone Circuit Court.
S. D. ROUSE, CHAS. STROTHER and DICKERSON & DICKERSON for appellant.
O. M. ROGERS for appellees.
Lucy J. Carpenter made her last will on February 2, 1920, and died May 1, 1922, survived by her husband, Willie Carpenter, and eight children. She had been twice married, each time to a husband named Carpenter. By her first marriage she had three children named Ben, Wood and Johnnie, the latter being a daughter. All three of these older children were married and living away from the parental home at the time of the making of the will. Her children by her second husband were Alice, Rowena, Ralph, Claude, Ruby and Blanche. After the making of the will Rowena died childless and intestate.
This action was commenced by the bank, as administrator of Mrs. Carpenter, praying that the accounts of the administrator be fully and completely settled in accordance with the construction of the will, and praying for a construction of the will, and that the cause be referred to the master commissioner to make a full and final settlement of the accounts, and that the master commissioner ascertain the amount in advancements made by testatrix to her children and the amount to be charged to each of them, the amount of indebtedness of the children to testatrix, with a final prayer that the chancellor advise the administrator concerning its duties in the premises and for all proper relief. The will was holographic, and reads:
After setting out the will, the petition avers:
"Plaintiff says there is a contention amongst the heirs and devisees of Lucy A. Carpenter, deceased, as to the import and meaning of said will, and this plaintiff is unwilling to take the risk of construing same, and is unable to construe it in such a manner as to protect it in the execution of said will, and so as to administer said estate, and seeks and is entitled to the advice and instruction of the court therein."
All facts with respect to the property owned by Lucy A. Carpenter at the time of her death are set forth in the petition. It also contains averments as to the amount of advancement made to each child and all other facts necessary to enable the court to properly construe the will and to determine the rights of the several parties. No demurrer or answer was filed to the petition. It is the only pleading in the record. The parties agree that the petition correctly set forth the character and extent of the estate of the decedent as well as the names of all her next of kin and heirs at law, and thus dispenses with necessity for proof. When the matter was submitted to the court, judgment was entered holding that the testatrix by her will did not intend to and did not in fact dispose of her entire estate but devised to her five younger children, to-wit, Alice, Ralph, Claude, Ruby and Blanche, the sixth child, Rowena, having died before her mother, the sum of five hundred dollars each, to equalize them in the matter of advancement with the three older children, and in addition to the foregoing she devised to Alice one hundred and fifty dollars, to Ralph fifty dollars, to Claude fifty...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Shaver v. Weddington
... ... enforceable precatory trust. The appellees, who are heirs of ... D. C. Steele, challenge those ... Gdn. v. Shaver's Ex'r, supra; Walton Bank & Trust ... Company v. Carpenter, 205 Ky. 629, 266 S.W. 358; ... ...
-
Hopson's Trustee v. Hopson
...S.W. (2d) 683; Corn v. Roach, 225 Ky. 725, 9 S.W. (2d) 1074; Anderson v. Simpson, 214 Ky. 375, 283 S.W. 941; Walton Bank & Trust Company v. Carpenter, 205 Ky. 629, 266 S.W. 358. Language somewhat similar to that used by A.H. Hopson in his will has been construed in a number of cases by this......