Wangnild v. Town of Haxtun

Decision Date06 May 1940
Docket Number14605.
Citation106 Colo. 180,103 P.2d 474
PartiesWANGNILD v. TOWN OF HAXTUN.
CourtColorado Supreme Court

Error to District Court, Phillips County; Arlington Taylor, Judge.

Action by Charles E. Wangnild against the Town of Haxtun, Colo., for damages resulting from failure of the defendant's treasurer to pay certain sanitary sewer district bonds in their numerical order. To review a judgment of dismissal, the plaintiff brings error.

Reversed and remanded, with instructions.

Myles P. Tallmadge, of Denver, for plaintiff in error.

Sauter & Sandhouse, of Sterling, for defendant in error.

BAKKE Justice.

Plaintiff in error, who was also plaintiff below, sought judgment for damages against defendant town because of failure of its treasurer to pay certain sanitary sewer district bonds in their numerical order. A general demurrer to the complaint based on insufficiency of statement of facts to constitute a cause of action, and a special demurrer on the ground of nonjoinder of parties directed to the failure to name the town treasurer as a defendant, were interposed. The court sustained the general demurrer on the ground that no general liability existed as against the town. Plaintiff elected to stand on his complaint and judgment of dismissal was duly entered.

The complaint, omitting formal parts, was in words and figures as follows.

'3. On or about the first day of January, A. D. 1921, defendant Town issued and delivered its Sanitary Sewer District No. 1 Bonds in the principal amount of $74,500, dated January 1, A D. 1921, consisting of 45 bonds in the denomination of $1,000 each, numbered 1 to 45, inclusive and 59 bonds in the denomination of $500 each, numbered 46 to 104, inclusive bearing interest at the rate of 6% per annum, payable semi-annually on January 1st and July 1st in each year, as evidence by interest coupons attached to said bonds. Said bonds, by their terms, were made payable on or Before the first day of January, A. D. 1938. Said bonds were duly issued pursuant to and in accordance with Sections 9464 to 9513 inclusive, Compiled Laws of Colorado, 1921, in anticipation of the collection of special assessments which were duly levied against real property in said Sanitary Sewer District No. 1, situated within the boundaries of defendant Town.

'4. Plaintiff is the owner and holder of bonds of said issue in the principal amount of $4,000, numbered 36, 37, 38, 42 and 45, in the denomination of $1,000 each.

'5. In accordance with said law, defendant Town paid and redeemed $35,000 of said issue of bonds in regular numerical order being bonds numbered 1 to 35, in clusive, in the denomination of $1,000 each, and paid all interest on the outstanding bonds of said issue up to and including the first day of July, 1937, but it has not paid the interest which became due on the outstanding bonds of said issue on the first day of January, A. D. 1938.

'6. Section 9502, Compiled Laws of Colorado 1921, being one of the sections of the law under which said bonds were issued, provides that bonds of the character of those involved in this action shall be paid in their numerical order. Notwithstanding said provision, defendant Town unlawfully paid and redeemed bonds of said issue of a face value of $8,000, namely bond numbered 43 in the denomination of $1,000, and bonds numbered 54, 58 to 67, and 87 to 89, all numbers inclusive, in the denominations of $500 each. The money used to pay said $8,000 of bonds was derived from said special assessments levied against real property in...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • City Real Estate, Inc. v. Sullivan
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • 7 Abril 1947
    ... ... certificates which originally ran to town responsible for ... their issuance were executed by town clerk rather than by ... town treasurer ... Employers Mutual Ins. Co. v. Board of Commissioners, ... 102 Colo. 177, 78 P.2d 380; Wangnild v. Town of ... Haxtun, 106 Colo. 180, 103 P.2d 474; Town of Haxtun ... v. Wangnild, 109 Colo, ... ...
  • City of Pueblo v. Grand Carniolian Slovenian Catholic Union of U.S. of America
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • 19 Diciembre 1960
    ...the bondholders, who were the cestuis que trustent.' Town of Haxtun v. Wangnild, 109 Colo. 518, 127 P.2d 328, 330; Wangnild v. Town of Haxtun, 106 Colo. 180, 103 P.2d 474. It must be borne in mind that the nature of a public fund derives from the type of exaction that is imposed to form the......
  • CRIST v. TOWN OF GALLUP
    • United States
    • New Mexico Supreme Court
    • 2 Agosto 1947
    ...trust is repudiated. We are of the opinion the Supreme Court of Colorado stated the correct rule on this point in Wangnild v. Town of Haxtun, 106 Colo. 180, 103 P.2d 474, and in the second appeal of the same case in 109 Colo. 518, 127 P.2d 328, that the owner of special improvements bonds c......
  • City of Sterling v. Commercial Sav. Bank of Sterling, 15424
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • 19 Mayo 1947
    ... ... Employers Mut. Ins. Co. v. Board of County ... Com'rs, 102 Colo. 177, 78 P.2d 380; Wangnild v ... Town of Haxtun, 106 Colo. 180, 103 P.2d 474; Town of ... Haxtun v. Wangnild, 109 Colo ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Management and Mismanagement of Municipal Special Improvement Districts
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Lawyer No. 22-10, October 1993
    • Invalid date
    ...Sav. Bank of Sterling, 181 P.2d 361 (Colo. 1947). 14. Town of Haxtun v. Wangnild, 127 P.2d 328 (Colo. 1942); Wangnild v. Town of Haxtun, 103 P.2d 474 (Colo. 1940). 15. Rising v. Hoffman, 179 P.2d 430 (Colo. 1947). 16. J. K. Mullen Investment Co., supra, note 13. 17. Id. 18. Bloom, supra, no......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT