Ward v. Cameron
Citation | 80 S.W. 69 |
Parties | WARD et al. v. CAMERON et al. |
Decision Date | 07 April 1904 |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Action by A. T. Ward and others against W. W. Cameron and others. From a judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals (76 S. W. 240) affirming a judgment in favor of defendants, plaintiff's bring error. Affirmed.
J. R. Hamilton, Bean & Nelms, and Walton & Walton, for plaintiffs in error. Stevenson & Stevenson, R. O. Kenley, and Nunn & Nunn, for defendants in error.
Plaintiffs in error sued in trespass to try title to recover from the defendants in error three tracts of land situated in Trinity county, located by virtue of two certificates issued by the Comptroller of the state of Texas to the heirs of John Ward, who fell at Goliad in the service of the republic of Texas. John Ward left but two heirs— David Ward, a brother, and Mary Ward, a sister; the latter being married to William Carson prior to the death of her brother. David Ward, William Carson, and his wife all lived in the state of Georgia. David Ward died without any issue, and Mary Carson and her husband are also dead; the plaintiffs in error being their descendants, and the only heirs of David Ward and Mary and William Carson. The plaintiffs in error are entitled to recover the land sued for, unless the defendants in error have shown that David Ward and Mary and William Carson parted with their interest in the lands or the certificates during their lives.
The defendants introduced in evidence two written instruments, each dated the 19th day of October, 1859, and each signed by David Ward. One of the instruments conveyed to Joseph N. Stripling donation land certificate No. 17, issued by Clement R. Johns, Comptroller of the state of Texas, to the heirs of John Ward, for 640 acres of land. The other instrument conveyed to J. N. Stripling bounty certificate No. 44, for 960 acres of land, issued by Clement Johns, Comptroller of the state of Texas, on September 27, 1859, to the heirs of John Ward. In each transfer David Ward covenanted that he was the only heir of John Ward, deceased, and upon each transfer was indorsed an affidavit as follows, to wit:
Each of the transfers was acknowledged at Savannah, Ga., before Joseph Felt, commissioner of deeds for the state of Texas, on the day of the date of the instrument; and each affidavit was signed by William Carson and Mary Carson, and sworn to before Joseph Felt, commissioner of deeds, on the day the transfers were made. The transfers were executed with the name of the grantee in blank, and afterwards filled in by the name as before stated. In one it was written, "Joseph N. Stripling," and in the other "J. N. Stripling"; the same person being the grantee in both transfers. Each transfer was, at the date of the trial, more than 30 years old, and had been duly recorded in Trinity county. J. R. Hamilton, one of the attorneys for plaintiffs in error, filed his affidavit of forgery to each of the transfers. Over objections by the plaintiffs in error, the court admitted these transfers in evidence. The defendants proved that the common law of England was in force in the state of Georgia up to the year 1866.
Defendants then introduced the following instrument:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Tirado v. Tirado, 7362
...Tex. 179; Castro v. Illies, 22 Tex. 479; Hill v. Townsend, 24 Tex. 575; Franklin v. Piper, 5 Tex.Civ.App., 253, 23 S.W. 942; Ward v. Cameron, 97 Tex. 466, 80 S.W. 69; Cox v. McClave, Tex.Civ.App., 22 S.W.2d 961, err. dism.; Grange v. Kayser, Tex.Civ.App., 80 S.W.2d 1007, N.W.H.; Bell v. Bel......
-
Rankin v. Rankin
...states that certain testimony was objected to because of certain facts is no evidence of the existence of such facts. In Ward v. Cameron, 97 Tex. 472, 80 S. W. 69, the bill of exceptions showed that a deposition was objected to because the party objecting had had no notice of the taking of ......
-
McMahan v. Musgrave
...testify. It is not sufficient merely to show that such an objection was made. Terrell v. McCown, 91 Tex. 231, 43 S.W. 2; Ward v. Cameron, 97 Tex. 466, 472, 80 S.W. 69; Clark v. State, Tex.Civ.App., 189 S.W. 84, 85; Gause-Ware Funeral Home v. McGinley, Tex.Civ.App., 41 S.W.2d 433, 434, Writ.......
-
Southern Casualty Co. v. Vatter
...the court approving the bill that the claimed grounds, in fact, existed. Rankin v. Rankin (Tex. Civ. App.) 134 S. W. 392; Ward v. Cameron, 97 Tex. 472, 80 S. W. 69; Terrell v. McCown, 91 Tex. 241, 43 S. W. 2; Whitaker v. Gee, 61 Tex. 218; Henry v. Whitaker, 82 Tex. 8, 17 S. W. 509; Hurd v. ......