Ward v. Sherman
Decision Date | 21 March 1901 |
Docket Number | Civil 746 |
Citation | 7 Ariz. 277,64 P. 434 |
Parties | J. M. WARD, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MOSES H. SHERMAN et al., Defendants and Appellees |
Court | Arizona Supreme Court |
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Third Judicial District in and for the County of Maricopa. Webster Street Judge. Affirmed.
Kibbey & Edwards, and E. J. Edwards, for Appellant.
C. F Ainsworth, Frank Cox, and C. N. Sterry, for Appellees.
The brief of the appellant in this case contains the following assignment of errors: The rules of this court (rule 3, 4 Ariz. ix 35 Pac. vi) require It is further prescribed (rule 6, 4 Ariz. xi, 35 Pac. vii) that There is objection made by counsel for the appellee to the consideration of the assignment of errors in this case on the ground that the same does not conform to the requirements of the statute and the rules of the court. The objection is well founded. The errors assigned are but general and indefinite. They point us to nothing specific, and utterly fail to comply with the express provision of our rules. This court is an appellate one, and the prime object of these rules is the designation of specified errors, in order that the court and opposite counsel may be clearly informed of what particular ruling or action below is relied upon for the reversal or modification of the judgment. An assignment which does not distinctly point out these matters, -- one which compels the court and counsel to look further, and to search the brief and record, in order to discover them, -- entirely fails to accomplish the purpose of its being. Not one of the errors here alleged is...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Prescott Nat. Bank v. Head
... ... for consideration. They are of the same character as those ... which were refused consideration in Ward v. Sherman, ... 7 Ariz. 277, 64 P. 434; Charouleau v. Shields, 9 ... Ariz. 73, 76 P. 821, and Daniel v. Gallagher, ante, ... p. 151, 89 P ... ...
-
Pinal County v. Heiner
... ... Joerger, 15 ... Ariz. 480, 140 P. 209; Estate of Scarry, 15 Ariz ... 246, 137 P. 868; Main v. Main, 7 Ariz. 149, ... 60 P. 888; Ward v. Sherman, 7 Ariz. 277, 64 ... P. 434; Wiser v. Lawler, 7 Ariz. 163, 62 P ... 695; Sherman v. Goodwin, 11 Ariz. 141, 89 ... P. 517; Wootan v ... ...
-
Sullivan v. Jones
...they cannot be examined. Roy & Titcomb v. Flin, 10 Ariz. 80, 85 P. 725; Demund Co. v. Stillwell, 8 Ariz. 1, 68 P. 543; Ward v. Sherman, 7 Ariz. 277, 64 P. 434; v. Newmark, 3 Ariz. 224, 28 P. 960. Where a judgment is rendered upon a disputed statement of facts, this court will not disturb th......
-
Liberty Min. & Smelting Co. v. Geddes
... ... review of this case. Prescott Nat. Bank v. Head, 11 ... Ariz. 213; 90 P. 328; Charouleau v. Shields, 9 Ariz ... 73, 76 P. 821; Ward v. Sherman, 7 Ariz. 277, 64 P ... 434. If the attempt made in the brief to elaborate the first ... assignment be considered as sufficiently ... ...