Ward v. State

Citation105 S.E. 373,26 Ga.App. 61
Decision Date16 December 1920
Docket Number11710.
PartiesWARD v. STATE.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Error from City Court of Bainbridge; H. B. Spooner, Judge.

P. H. Ward was convicted of abandonment of a child, and he brings error. Affirmed.

McMillan & Erwin, of Clarkesville, and W. V. Custer, of Bainbridge, for plaintiff in error.

BLOODWORTH, J.

This was a case of abandonment of a child. By agreement it was submitted to the judge, who passed upon the case without the intervention of a jury. In such a case it is not necessary that the same strictness as to the admission of evidence be adhered to as when the case is submitted to a jury, as the judge, upon a final determination of the case, is supposed to be able to "sift the wheat from the chaff," and from the legal evidence alone determine the issues. There was some evidence to support the finding of the judge that the city court of Bainbridge had jurisdiction of the case; and, when all the facts are considered, the exceptions to the rulings of the court do not point out any error that would require the grant of a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

BROYLES, C.J., and LUKE, J., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Ward v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • December 16, 1920

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT