Warren Petroleum Corp. v. Martin
Decision Date | 21 July 1954 |
Docket Number | No. A-4585,A-4585 |
Parties | WARREN PETROLEUM CORP. v. MARTIN. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Nelson, Montgomery, Robertson & Sellers, Wichita Falls, for petitioner.
Thornton & Thornton, Olney, for respondent.
The respondent, J. W. Martin, brought this suit against petitioner, Warren Petroleum Corporation, seeking damages growing out of the death and injury of cattle belonging to respondent as a result of negligence of the petitioner. Petitioner's motion for instructed verdict was overruled. The jury, in answer to special issues, found the petitioner guilty of negligence and the respondent not guilty of contributory negligence and assessed damages in the sum of $1,634.36. Judgment was entered in favor of respondent. That judgment has been affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals for the Second Supreme Judicial District of Texas. 265 S.W.2d 199.
On July 14, 1948, and at all times involved herein, petitioner was the lessee and operator of an oil and gas lease covering a tract of land consisting of 155.7 acres situated in Young County, Texas. The oil and gas lease was in force and oil was being produced when respondent secured a surface lease on the same land from the owner thereof. The well was located on a tract of about 40 acres out of the larger tract. This tract was under fence and was the portion of land used by respondent as a pasture. Respondent's house and other improvements were within the 40 acre enclosure. The oil well, which was a 'pumper' at the time the alleged negligence and resulting damages occurred, was located about 1/4 mile from the house. Respondent had visited near the well many times. He knew the well and pump jack were not fenced and he also had heard that cattle would drink oil.
Respondent's cause of action charging negligence on the part of petitioner rests on the following allegation in his pleadings:
No evidence was introduced to the effect that the pumping equipment was defective, and it was neither alleged nor proved that the petitioner was negligent in using defective equipment. Respondent's and petitioner's pleadings are silent on the question of whether or not petitioner used more land than was reasonably necessary to carry on the oil operations provided for in the oil and gas lease. It is equally true that no evidence was introduced and no issues were submitted to the jury on the question. The Court of Civil Appeals has held, in effect, that the sole fact that oil was found in two pools, one containing about one gallon, the other about one and one half gallons, located about five feet from the well sustains the finding of the jury that petitioner was negligent in permitting the oil to escape, and that such evidence is proof that the pump was defective. The Court of Civil Appeals goes further to hold that under Rule 279, there was a presumed finding by the trial court that the petitioner used more of the surface of the ground than was reasonably necessary for the operation of the oil and gas lease.
The mere fact that petitioner permitted oil to escape and form in small pools within 5 feet of the well, without any showing as to the manner in which the lease was being operated at the time, could not form the basis for a legal inference that such conduct constituted negligence. Neither can such fact be used as a basis for a presumed finding that the petitioner used more land than was reasonably...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Armstrong v. Chambers & Kennedy
...gas on land, it presents new and more dangerous challenges in its development. 35 Tex.L.Rev. 1; 33 Tex.L.Rev. 574; Warren Petr. Corp. v. Martin, 153 Tex. 465, 271 S.W.2d 410, reh. den. (1954). Thus, the duty placed here upon the oil lessee is similar to the traditional tort duty of one usin......
-
Sun Oil Co. v. Whitaker
...rights of the owner of the surface estate. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Williams, 420 S.W.2d 133 (Tex.1967); Warren Petroleum Corp. v. Martin, 153 Tex. 465, 271 S.W.2d 410 (1954); Warren Petroleum Corp. v. Monzingo, 157 Tex. 479, 304 S,.W.2d 362 (1957); Brown v. Lundell, 162 Tex. 84, 344 S.......
-
American Industries Life Ins. v. Ruvalcaba
...of the trial court's judgment, the presumed findings must be supported by the evidence. Tex.R. Civ. P. 299; Warren Petroleum Corp. v. Martin, 153 Tex. 465, 271 S.W.2d 410, 412 (1954) ("The court cannot presume a finding unless the evidence supports such a finding"); Vickery, 5 S.W.3d at 252......
-
Michigan Oil Co. v. Natural Resources Com'n
...Okl. 518, 34 P.2d 278 (1934); Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co. v. Truesdell, 187 S.W.2d 418 (Tex.Civ.App., 1945); Warren Petroleum Corp. v. Martin, 153 Tex. 465, 271 S.W.2d 410 (1954); Jones v. Nafco Oil & Gas, Inc., 371 S.W.2d 584 (Tex.Civ.App., 1963), Aff'd, 380 S.W.2d 570 (Tex., 1964); Young......