Warren v. Ash
Decision Date | 15 August 1907 |
Citation | 129 Ga. 329,58 S.E. 858 |
Parties | WARREN. v. ASH et al. |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
The conveyance of the timber from the plaintiffs to the persons under whom the defendant claims passed an estate in the growing trees, determinable upon the grantees' failure to cut and remove the timber within a reasonable time, not less than five years.
A grantor who has conveyed timber to another, to be cut in a reasonable time, is not concerned with the validity or formality of execution of his gtantee's assignment of title thereto to a third person, made before the grantee's estate therein has terminated.
Standing timber is part of the realty; and the owner of the soil, who has by deed conveyed the timber, is not revested with the title by a mere verbal declaration of the owner of the timber that he surrendered it to the owner of the soil. Such verbal declaration would not work an estoppel, when the owner of the soil had not acted thereon.
[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 40, Property, § 4.]
(Syllabus by the Court.)
Error from Superior Court, Decatur County; W. N. Spence, Judge.
Action by R. P. Ash and others against S. J. Warren. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error. Affirmed, with directions.
The plaintiffs, on June 24, 1904, sold to Smith, Sims & Morea, a shingle mill and certain standing timber, and executed to the purchasers the following instrument: The purchasers oper-ated the mill for two years after their purchase, when they removed the mill and sold the houses erected on the mill site. On February 13, 1907, J. F. M. Smith, one of the purchasers, transferred in writing the fore-going timber lease to S. J. Warren. The plaintiff's sought to enjoin Warren from cut-ting any of the timber on the described lots of land. On the interlocutory hearing the plaintiffs submitted affidavits that one of the firm of Smith, Sims & Morea, when he was moving the shingle mill, stated to one of the plaintiffs that he had cut all of the timberconveyed by the lease and that he surrendered the premises...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Sikes v. Seckinger, (No. 5526.)
...and vested by transmutation of possession. Jordan v. Pollock, 14 Ga. 145; Holder v. Scarborough, 119 Ga. 256, 46 S. E. 93; Warren v. Ash, 129 Ga. 329, 58 S. E. 858; King v. McDuffie, 144 Ga. 318, 87 S. E. 22; Drew v. Drew, 146 Ga. 479, 91 S. E. 541; Padgett v. Norrell, 157 Ga. 526, 122 S. E......
-
Tarver v. Depper
...Prop. § 1888; 2 Reeves, Real Prop. § 1007. Also, in this connection, see Holder v. Scarborough, 119 Ga. 256, 46 S. E. 93; Warren v. Ash, 129 Ga. 329, 58 S. E. 858; Peyton v. Stephens, 130 Ga. 338, 60 S. E. 563, 124 Am. St. Rep. 170. We do not construe the decision in the case of Williamson ......
-
Tarver v. Depper
...Prop. § 1888; 2 Reeves, Real Prop. § 1007. Also, in this connection, see Holder v. Scarborough, 119 Ga. 256, 46 S.E. 93; Warren v. Ash, 129 Ga. 329, 58 S.E. 858; v. Stephens, 130 Ga. 338, 60 S.E. 563, 124 Am.St.Rep. 170. We do not construe the decision in the case of Williamson v. Mosley, 1......
-
Camp v. Horton
... ... sufficient for their growth, though the fee to the soil ... remained in the grantor, and that, under the terms of the ... conveyance, the estate in the trees was not terminated and ... forfeited by a failure of the grantee to remove them in a ... reasonable time. In Warren v. Ash, 129 Ga. 329, 58 ... S.E. 858, the instrument then under consideration was held to ... convey an estate in growing trees, determinable upon the ... grantee's failure to cut within a reasonable time, not ... less than five years ... In the ... construction of a ... ...