Warren v. City of Marietta

Decision Date10 March 1982
Docket NumberNo. 38244,38244
Citation249 Ga. 205,288 S.E.2d 562
Parties, 3 Ed. Law Rep. 199 Richard WARREN et al. v. The CITY OF MARIETTA, Georgia.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Ted B. Herbert, Marietta, for Richard Warren et al.

Roy Barnes, Barnes & Browning, Marietta, for the City of Marietta.

WELTNER, Justice.

The trial court enjoined Warren, a Cobb County school bus driver, from parking a school bus in her driveway overnight in violation of a City of Marietta zoning ordinance.

Upon hiring Warren as a bus driver in March 1980, the Cobb County School Board informed her that drivers are encouraged, though not required, to park buses at their residences for security and economic reasons. Warren testified that prior to accepting employment, she contacted the Marietta Zoning and Planning Commission and was told that there were no restrictions on parking school buses at residences in Marietta.

The ordinance in effect when Warren was hired provided:

"Art. VIII(E)(8)(f). The Parking of Business Vehicles. In any R or RM District the parking of business vehicles other than ordinary passenger automobiles shall be within a garage or carport or within a side or rear yard except for official government vehicles. The parking of any business vehicle other than a pick-up or panel truck used to provide daily transportation to and from work and any vehicle with the carrying capacity of more than one and one half (1 1/2) tons is prohibited in any residential district."

A city councilman testified that after complaints from Warren's neighbors, the zoning ordinance was amended March 11, 1981, with an effective date of 30 days, to provide:

"Art. VIII(E)(8)(f). Parking of Business Vehicles. In any R or RM district no business vehicles shall be allowed to park either on the property so zoned or on the streets abutting such property except as provided herein. Business vehicles under 8000 lbs. gross volume weight shall be allowed parked in a carport or within a side or rear yard of property zoned R or RM. Provided, however, business vehicles exceeding 8000 lbs. gross weight shall be allowed parked in a carport or within a side or rear yard of property zoned R or RM during daylight hours, but not overnight or on Saturdays or Sundays. Daylight hours shall mean 30 minutes after dawn to 30 minutes after sunset."

In August 1981, the City of Marietta petitioned the superior court to restrain Warren from parking the bus in violation of the amended ordinance, and Warren counterclaimed for injunction and damages. She testified that although she would not be fired, compliance with the City's demand would cause her to resign because she fears for her safety in the school bus parking lot.

(1) Warren alleges that the school bus is not a "business vehicle" under the ordinance, but is a government vehicle owned by the county school board.

The original 1974 ordinance regulated the "parking of business vehicles... except for official governmental vehicles." Thus, it classified governmental vehicles as a type of business vehicles for the purposes of this ordinance. The amended ordinance eliminates the exception for governmental vehicles, and distinguished only between personal and business vehicles, with the latter category apparently encompassing certain vehicles driven for hire, whether or not the employer is a private enterprise or a government agency. Therefore, school buses are properly included as business vehicles under the ordinance.

(2) Warren contends that the ordinance is an abuse of police power, and an unconstitutional taking of property.

We have upheld the constitutionality of zoning ordinances based solely "... on the advancement of the city's aesthetic interests. This justification is reasonable and proper....

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • City of Atlanta Bd. of Zoning Adjustment v. Midtown North, Ltd., s. 44399
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • September 24, 1987
    ...uses and those who are prohibited from erecting such buildings or commencing such uses in the future." See Warren v. City of Marietta, 249 Ga. 205, 207(3), 288 S.E.2d 562 (1982). 4. As this was an appeal from an administrative decision, " 'the only review authorized is that inherent in the ......
  • Johnson v. Mid States Screw & Bolt Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • June 8, 1984
  • NORTH GA. MTN. CRISIS v. City of Blue Ridge
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • March 6, 2001
    ...678 (1978). 8. See, e.g., Shoemake v. Woodland Equities, 252 Ga. 389, 392(1), 313 S.E.2d 689 (1984). 9. Warren v. City of Marietta, 249 Ga. 205, 207(3), 288 S.E.2d 562 (1982). 10. Id. 11. (Punctuation omitted.) Id. 12. On appeal, the Crisis Network has not challenged the legality of the pro......
  • Gowen Oil Co. v. Greenberg Traurig, LLP, 11-10317
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • December 13, 2011

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT