Wash. Mut. Bank v. Holt
| Decision Date | 22 January 2014 |
| Citation | 113 A.D.3d 755,979 N.Y.S.2d 612,2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 00344 |
| Parties | WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, respondent, v. Oscar HOLT III, appellant, et al., defendants. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Oscar Holt III, Westbury, N.Y., appellant pro se.
Stagg, Terenzi, Confusione & Wabnik, LLP, Garden City, N.Y. (Jacqueline M. Della Chiesa and Owen A. Kloter of counsel), for respondent.
MARK C. DILLON, J.P., JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, and ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Oscar Holt III appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cullen, J.), entered December 8, 2011, which, after a hearing to determine the validity of service of process, denied those branches of his motion which were pursuant to CPLR 5015(a), inter alia, to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale entered against him upon his failure to appear or answer, and pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(8) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against him for lack of personal jurisdiction.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the facts, with costs, and those branches of the motion of the defendant Oscar Holt III which were pursuant to CPLR 5015(a) to vacate the judgment of foreclosure and sale and pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(8) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against him for lack of personal jurisdiction are granted.
The plaintiff commenced this action against Oscar Holt III, among others, to foreclose a mortgage secured by a multiple dwelling (hereinafter the premises) owned by Holt and situated in Corona, Queens. To assure that those tenants who were in possession of residential units at the premises would be bound by any subsequent entry of a judgment of foreclosure against Holt ( see Nationwide Assoc. v. Brunne, 216 A.D.2d 547, 547, 629 N.Y.S.2d 769), the plaintiff allegedly attempted to join those tenants as defendants in this action. The plaintiff's process server testified at a hearing that he attempted to serve process upon several tenants residing in apartments at the premises. The process server further testified that he served copies of the summons and complaint upon Holt at Holt's residence in Westbury by employing the “affix and mail” method ( seeCPLR 308[4] ), after unsuccessfully attempting personal delivery and service pursuant to CPLR 308(2) on four prior dates.
This Court possesses authority to review a determination rendered after a hearing that is as broad as that of the hearing court, and may render the determination it finds warranted by the facts, taking into account that, in a close case, the hearing court had the advantage of seeing the witnesses ( see Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc. v. Town of Bedford, 60 N.Y.2d 492, 499, 470 N.Y.S.2d 350, 458 N.E.2d 809; Lopez v. DePietro, 82 A.D.3d 715, 716, 917 N.Y.S.2d 318; American Home Mtge. v. Villaflor, 80 A.D.3d 637, 914 N.Y.S.2d 676).
Although, as a general matter, we do not lightly disturb findings that are based upon conflicting evidence and implicate the credibility of witnesses, the evidence adduced at the hearing warrants a reversal of the Supreme Court's determination that process was properly effected upon Holt ( see Matter of...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
E. Sav. Bank, FSB v. Campbell
...N.Y.S.2d 435, 517 N.E.2d 1321 ; Jhang v. Nassau Univ. Med. Ctr., 140 A.D.3d 1018, 1019, 35 N.Y.S.3d 360 ; Washington Mut. Bank v. Holt, 113 A.D.3d 755, 757, 979 N.Y.S.2d 612 ).I also agree that Parker did not waive the defense of lack of 167 A.D.3d 717personal jurisdiction. I respectfully d......
-
Bedessee Imports, Inc. v. Najjar
...A.D.3d 776, 778, 51 N.Y.S.3d 523 ; Jhang v. Nassau Univ. Med. Ctr., 140 A.D.3d 1018, 1019, 35 N.Y.S.3d 360 ; Washington Mut. Bank v. Holt, 113 A.D.3d 755, 757, 979 N.Y.S.2d 612 ). Under these circumstances, the defendant's jurisdictional claim was wholly conclusory, and he was not entitled ......
-
Jhang v. Nassau Univ. Med. Ctr.
...the summons and complaint to the defendant's agent at the hospital where the subject incident occurred (see Washington Mut. Bank v. Holt, 113 A.D.3d 755, 757, 979 N.Y.S.2d 612 ; Billings v. Southside Hosp., 122 A.D.2d 101, 504 N.Y.S.2d 1019 ; Feeney v. Booth Mem. Med. Ctr., 109 A.D.2d 865, ......
-
Bny Mellon, N.A. v. S (In re Mercer)
...sufficiency of the opposing papers ( see Winegrad v. New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 N.Y.2d 851, 853, 487 N.Y.S.2d 316, 476 N.E.2d 642; [979 N.Y.S.2d 612]Blanche, Verte & Blanche, Ltd. v. Joseph Mauro & Sons, 79 A.D.3d 1082, 1084, 913 N.Y.S.2d 342; Qlisanr, LLC v. Hollis Park Manor Nursing Hom......