Washington, In re, 97-731
Decision Date | 08 September 1997 |
Docket Number | No. 97-731,97-731 |
Citation | 122 F.3d 1345 |
Parties | 97 CJ C.A.R. 1864 In re: Michael C. WASHINGTON, Petitioner. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit |
Before BALDOCK and BRORBY, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Michael C. Washington has filed for a writ in the nature of mandamus under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651. He also seeks leave of this court to proceed with his petition without the prepayment of fees, and has submitted the necessary forms and declarations. Because we conclude that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) prevents petitioner from proceeding in forma pauperis in this proceeding, we deny petitioner leave to proceed without prepayment of fees.
"Section 1915(g) generally prevents a prisoner from proceeding in forma pauperis in civil actions if three or more of his prior suits have been dismissed as frivolous or malicious, or for failure to state a claim." Green v. Nottingham, 90 F.3d 415, 418 (10th Cir.1996). As in Green, petitioner here has filed three or more such actions. See Washington v. Loving, No. 96-6192, 1997 WL 111259, at ** 2 (10th Cir. March 13, 1997) ( ); Washington v. Loving, No 94-6466, 1995 WL 421131, at ** 1 (10th Cir. July 18, 1995) ( ). Petitioner's history satisfies the requirements of § 1915(g).
In Green this court concluded that petitions for mandamus qualify as "civil actions" under § 1915(g). See 90 F.3d at 418. Accordingly, petitioner cannot file this petition without prepayment of costs or fees. Further, we direct the clerk of this court not to accept from petitioner any future filings of extraordinary writs in noncriminal matters or appeals of judgment in civil actions or proceedings unless he first pays the applicable filing fees, except in those instances that petitioner's filings claim that he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
Petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner may resubmit his petition by paying the required filing fee, see 10th Cir. R. 21.1.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hochstadt v. Israel
...loophole Congress surely did not intend in its stated goal of discouraging frivolous and abusive prison lawsuits); In Re: Michael C. Washington, 122 F.3d 1345 (10 Cir. 1997) (petitions for writ of mandamus qualify as "civil actions" under §1915(g)); Hicks v. Brysch, 989 F.Supp. 797 (W.D.Tex......
-
Miller v. Williamson Cnty.
...re-labeling of an action as one formandamus would allow prisoners to evade the PLRA requirements and consequences. See In re Washington, 122 F.3d 1345 (10th Cir. 1997); In re Tyler, 110 F.3d 528, 529 (8th Cir. 1997); Green v. Nottingham, 90 F.3d 415, 418 (10th Cir. 1996). Accordingly, the m......
-
Boney v. Hickey
...Congress surely did not intend in its stated goal of discouraging frivolous and abusive prison lawsuits); In Re: Michael C. Washington, 122 F.3d 1345 (10 Cir. 1997) (petitions for writ of mandamus qualify as "civil actions" under §1915(g)); Hicks v. Brysch, 989 F.Supp. 797 (W.D.Tex. 1997) (......
-
Fredrick v. Georgia
...D. Jacobs, a/k/a Ya qub, 213 F.3d 289 (5th Cir. 2000); Green v. Nottingham, 90 F.3d 415, 418 (10th Cir. 1996); In Re: Michael C. Washington, 122 F.3d 1345 (10th Cir. 1997); Hicks v. Brysch, 989 F. Supp. 797 (W.D. Tex. 1997)); see also In re Smith, 114 F.3d 1247, 1250 (D.C. Cir. 1997) ("[I]t......