Washington Local Lodge No. 104 of Intern. Broth. of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders & Helpers of America v. International Broth. of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders & Helpers of America
Citation | 203 P.2d 1019,33 Wn.2d 1 |
Decision Date | 21 February 1949 |
Docket Number | 30485. |
Court | United States State Supreme Court of Washington |
Parties | WASHINGTON LOCAL LODGE NO. 104 OF INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF BOILERMAKERS, IRON SHIP BUILDERS & HELPERS OF AMERICA et al. v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF BOILERMAKERS, IRON SHIP BUILDERS & HELPERS OF AMERICA et al. |
Rehearing Denied May 4, 1949.
Action by Washington Local Lodge No. 104 of the International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders and Helpers of America and others, against the International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders and Helpers of America Charles J. MacGowan, William Williams, Homer Parrish and Walter B. Toner and others, for an injunction. The American Civil Liberties Union filed a brief as amicus curiae. Judgment granting an injunction only with respect to part of the relief sought, and the plaintiffs appeal and the named defendants cross-appeal.
Reversed and cause remanded with instructions.
Appeal from Superior Court, King County; Robert M Jones, judge.
Bassett & Geisness and Edward E. Henry, all of Seattle for appellants.
Chadwick Chadwick & Mills, of Seattle, for respondents and cross-appellants.
McMicken, Rupp & Schweppe and Mary Ellen Krug, all of Seattle, amici curiae.
This is an action for injunctive relief, instituted by Washington Local Lodge No. 104 of the International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders and Helpers of America, and Edward R. Hanson, Archie Collins, and T. A. Norgord, who allege that they are members of Lodge No. 104, and that they joined in the action against the parent organization on their own behalf and on behalf of all members of Lodge No. 104, who are too numerous to be made parties plaintiff. The defendants are the International Brotherhood and its president, Charles J. MacGowan, its vice president, William Williams, and several other officers, and two local banks in which Lodge No. 104 deposits its funds.
So many pleadings and affidavits, with long, typewritten exhibits attached, were filed in this cause that the transcript of record, certified by the King county clerk, consists of two hundred and thirty pages. The original complaint was filed on February 24, 1947. It will not be outlined at this point, as the cause was finally tried on a second amended complaint.
The filing of the complaint on February 24 was accompanied by a motion for an order requiring the defendants to show cause why a temporary restraining order should not be granted. The defendants were ordered to appear and show cause on March 4, 1947. The defendants' return to the order was largely by voluminous affidavits which were, in part, denied by affidavits filed on behalf of plaintiffs. On March 21, 1947, a temporary injunction was granted by the superior court, the material part of which will be quoted, since it throws much light upon the nature of the controversy:
'(1) Suspending, without notice, charges and hearing any of the duly elected or appointed officers of plaintiff Local Lodge 104 and/or interfering, directly or indirectly, with their administration of the affairs and activities of said Lodge;
'(2) Suspending, without notice, charges and hearing, the meetings of said Lodge 104;
'(3) Suspending or otherwise interfering with the publication of plaintiffs' weekly newspaper, known as the 104 Reporter, without notice, charges and hearing;
'(4) Seizing or attempting to seize, without notice, charges and hearing, either by force or otherwise, the funds, properties, books and records of said Lodge 104 and/or the control or management thereof;
'(5) Interfering, without notice, charges and hearing, either directly or indirectly, with the right of said Lodge 104 to manage its own affairs and/or disburse its own funds in accordance with the Subordinate Lodge constitution.
'It Is Further Ordered and Adjudged that the defendants Seattle-First National Bank and Peoples National Bank of Washington, and each of them, be and they are hereby restrained, pending the trial of this cause or the further order of the court, from refusing to honor such checks drawn on the accounts of plaintiff Local Lodge 104 as are jointly signed by the elected and authorized officers of said Lodge, namely, Walter B. Toner, its President, and Joe Clancy, its Secretary-Treasurer, and they, and each of them, are hereby restrained from honoring checks drawn on the accounts of said Lodge 104 and signed by any person or persons other than said elected and authorized officers of said Lodge, and said banks, and each of them, are further restrained and enjoined, until the further order of the court, from affording access to the safety deposit box of Local Lodge 104 to any person or persons other than said elected and authorized officers of said Lodge.
'It Is Further Ordered and Adjudged that the duly elected and qualified President and Secretary-Treasurer of plaintiff Local Lodge 104, namely, said Walter B. Toner and Joe Clancy, be and they are hereby restrained, until the further order of the court, from refusing to perform their duties and collecting and disbursing the funds of plaintiff Local Lodge 104 in accordance with the provisions of Article II of the Subordinate Lodge constitution, provided, however, that pending the trial of this cause or the further order of the court, the plaintiffs and their officers shall be and they are hereby restrained from making any withdrawals from Local 104's safety deposit box No. 1967 in the Seaboard Branch of the Seattle-First National Bank and from withdrawing any funds from the Local's special payroll account with said Bank and from the Local's building fund account with the Metropolitan Branch of said Bank, and said bank is likewise restrained from permitting any withdrawals from said safety deposit box and/or said accounts.
'And It Is Further Ordered and Adjudged that, pending the trial of this cause, or the further order of the court, Local Lodge 104 and its officers shall be and they are hereby restrained from making any withdrawals from its sick fund account with the Seaboard Branch of the Seattle-First National Bank, except such withdrawals as are made for the uses and purposes for which said fund was established, and from drawing any checks against or any funds from any other account or accounts which Local 104 has...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Parks v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Wkrs.
...N.W.2d 771; Ellis v. American Federation of Labor, 48 Cal.App.2d 440, 120 P.2d 79; Washington Local Lodge v. International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, 33 Wash. 2d 1, at 68-69, 203 P.2d 1019, at 1058-1059; Gardner v. Newbert, 74 Ind.App. 183, 128 N.E. 33 The evidence shows that provisions i......
-
Parks v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Wkrs.
...Operating Engineers v. Pierce, 321 S.W.2d 914, 918, 919 (Tex.Civ.App.1959); Washington Local Lodge No. 104, etc. v. International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, 33 Wash.2d 1, 68-71, 203 P.2d 1019, 1058-1059 (1949); see also, Annotation, 21 A.L.R.2d 1397, 1403 (1952); 87 C.J.S. Trade Unions § ......
-
Zylstra v. Piva, 43485
...remedies will not be required where resort to those procedures would be futile. See Washington Local 104, Boilermakers v. International Bhd. of Boilermakers, 33 Wash.2d 1, 203 P.2d 1019 (1949). Here, remedies prescribed by either the bargaining act or the contract in question would have bee......
-
Naylor v. Harkins
...373, etc. v. International, &c., Ironworkers, 120 N.J.Eq. 220, 230, 184 A. 531 (E. & A.1936); Washington Local Lodge v. International Brotherhood, 33 Wash.2d 1, 203 P.2d 1019, 1046 (Sup.Ct.1949); 168 A.L.R. 1462, 1473 (1947). In the Walsche case Vice Chancellor Berry collected decisions hol......
-
§23.2.6 Analysis
...Laborers Union v. Superior Court for King Cnty, 30 Wn.2d 697, 193P.2d362 (1948); Wash. Local Lodge No. 104 v. Int'lBhd. of Boilermakers, 33 Wn.2d 1, 203P.2d1019 (1949). But see Vashon Fruit Union v. J.W. Godwin & Co., 87 Wash. 384,151 P. 797 (1915) (denying union the right to pursue class a......