Washington Mutual Bank, F.A. v. O'Connor
| Citation | 63 A.D.3d 832,880 N.Y.S.2d 696,2009 NY Slip Op 04896 |
| Decision Date | 09 June 2009 |
| Docket Number | 2008-05426. |
| Parties | WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F.A., Appellant, v. TERRENCE C. O'CONNOR et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court Appellate Division |
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs payable by the respondents, and the plaintiff's motion is granted.
The plaintiff established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by presenting the mortgage and unpaid note, along with evidence of the default (see U.S. Bank Natl. Assn. TR U/S 6/01/98 [Home Equity Loan Trust 1998-2] v Alvarez, 49 AD3d 711 [2008]; Daniel Perla Assoc., LP v 101 Kent Assoc., Inc., 40 AD3d 677 [2007]; US Bank Trust N.A. Trustee v Butti, 16 AD3d 408 [2005]; Republic Natl. Bank of N.Y. v O'Kane, 308 AD2d 482 [2003]). In opposition, it was incumbent upon the defendants Terrence C. O'Connor and Sheila K. O'Connor "to produce evidentiary proof in admissible form sufficient to require a trial of [their] defenses" (US Bank Trust N.A. Trustee v Butti, 16 AD3d at 408). These defendants failed to do so. Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have granted the plaintiff's motion, inter alia, for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against those two defendants.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
PennyMac, Corp. v. Darren DiPrima
...22 [2d Dept.2010] ; Wells Fargo Bank v. Karla, 71 A.D.3d 1006, 896 N.Y.S.2d 681 [2d Dept.2010] ; Washington Mut. Bank v. O'Connor, 63 A.D.3d 832, 880 N.Y.S.2d 696 [2d Dept.2009] ; J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Agnello, 62 A.D.3d 662, 878 N.Y.S.2d 397 [2d Dept.2009] ; Aames Funding Corp. v......
-
Bank of N.Y. v. Morga
...22 [2d Dept.2010] ; Wells Fargo Bank v. Karla, 71 A.D.3d 1006, 896 N.Y.S.2d 681 [2d Dept.2010] ; Washington Mut. Bank v. O'Connor, 63 A.D.3d 832, 880 N.Y.S.2d 696 [2d Dept.2009] ; J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, NA v. Agnello, 62 A.D.3d 662, 878 N.Y.S.2d 397 [2d Dept.2009] ; Aames Funding Corp. v. ......
-
Carver Fed. Sav. Bank v. Redeemed Christian Church of God, Int'l Chapel, HHH Parish, Long Island, N.Y., Inc.
...defenses ( see Grogg Assocs. v. South Rd. Assocs., 74 A.D.3d 1021, 907 N.Y.S.2d 22 [2d Dept 2010]; Washington Mut. Bank v. O'Connor, 63 A.D.3d 832, 880 N.Y.S.2d 696 [2d Dept 2009] ). A defense not properly stated or one which has no merit is subject to dismissal pursuant to CPLR 3211(b). It......
-
Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v. Arthur
...477 [2d Dept 2011] ; Wells Fargo Bank v. Das Karla, 71 AD3d 1006, 896 N.Y.S.2d 681 [2d Dept 2010] ; Washington Mut. Bank, F.A. v. O'Connor, 63 AD3d 832, 880 N.Y.S.2d 696 [2d Dept 2009] ). The burden then shifts to the defendant to demonstrate “the existence of a triable issue of fact as to ......