Wassmer v. State, 88-00291
| Decision Date | 10 August 1990 |
| Docket Number | No. 88-00291,88-00291 |
| Citation | 565 So.2d 856 |
| Parties | 15 Fla. L. Weekly D2058 Kimberly WASSMER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender and Kevin Briggs, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and William I. Munsey, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
Kimberly Wassmer pleaded nolo contendere to possession of cocaine and possession of paraphernalia but reserved the right to appeal the trial court's denial of her motion to suppress. She contends, rightfully, that the evidence was the fruit of an unlawful search. We reverse.
The events leading to Wassmer's arrest began in late 1987 when Guy Dekin, a Days Inn security guard, saw Michael O'Farrell entering Wassmer's hotel room. O'Farrell had caused trouble at Days Inn in the past, and Dekin knew that he had been warned to stay off the property. In fact, Days Inn management had given O'Farrell a formal trespass warning. Therefore, Dekin carefully noted which room O'Farrell was in and called the police to have him removed.
When law enforcement officers arrived, Dekin went with them to the room and knocked. Wassmer peeked out, but did not open the door, so after knocking again Dekin used his passkey to open it. Before they entered the room, officers recognized a crushed aluminum can on the floor as cocaine paraphernalia. Once inside, they found rock cocaine on the floor as well.
We conclude that Dekin's opening the door to Wassmer's room violated her fourth amendment privacy rights. A motel manager has no power by consent or invitation to waive a guest's fourth amendment privacy rights. McGibiany v. State, 399 So.2d 125 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Sheff v. State, 301 So.2d 13 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974), aff'd, 329 So.2d 270 (Fla.1976). Nor does a motel security guard have the power to do so by forcing open the door of a guest who refuses to open it.
In McGibiany, an assistant manager went to investigate the occupancy of an officially vacant room. An off-duty law enforcement officer, who was working as a hotel security guard, went along to protect her. Before they realized that the room was lawfully occupied, they found contraband inside it.
The First District held this an unlawful search. It concluded that because a law enforcement officer accompanied the manager and participated in the search, that all constitutional restrictions applied. It went on to say:
While it may be assumed that the manager had a right to enter room 715 for the purposes...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Morse v. State
...a warrantless search, unless appellant had given up his reasonable expectation of privacy in the premises. See Wassmer v. State, 565 So.2d 856, 857 (Fla. 2d DCA1990) (denial of motion to suppress was error, where drug paraphernalia was discovered because motel security guard with passkey ad......
-
Nelson v. State, 5D02-3357.
...TO POLICE Nelson cites Turner v. State, 645 So.2d 444 (Fla.1994),Gnann v. State, 662 So.2d 406 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995), and Wassmer v. State, 565 So.2d 856 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990), for the general rule that constitutional rights and privileges that apply to occupants of private permanent dwellings al......
-
Turner v. State, 79895
...a private dwelling if the occupant is there legally, has paid or arranged to pay, and has not been asked to leave. Wassmer v. State, 565 So.2d 856, 857 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). Thus, constitutional rights and privileges that apply to occupants of private permanent dwellings also apply to motel g......
-
Gnann v. State
...a private dwelling if the occupant is there legally, has paid or arranged to pay, and has not been asked to leave. Wassmer v. State, 565 So.2d 856, 857 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). The constitutional rights and privileges that apply to occupants of private permanent dwellings also apply to motel gue......