Waters of Saratoga Springs, Inc. v. State
Decision Date | 04 September 1986 |
Docket Number | No. 69282,69282 |
Citation | 68 N.Y.2d 777,506 N.Y.S.2d 673,498 N.E.2d 146 |
Parties | , 498 N.E.2d 146 WATERS OF SARATOGA SPRINGS, INC., Appellant, v. STATE of New York, Respondent. (Claim) |
Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
The order of the Appellate Division, 116 A.D.2d 875, 498 N.Y.S.2d 196, should be affirmed, with costs.
Claimant's claim and amended claim, filed more than two years after accrual of the alleged causes of action, were properly dismissed (see, Court of Claims Act § 10[4] ). Similarly, claimant's application to deem its notice of intention to file a claim as a notice of claim was correctly denied, there being no cause of action stated upon which the requested relief can be granted. Insofar as the notice of intention asserted arbitrary and capricious conduct in excess of the State's authority, the alleged wrongdoing (requiring warning labels on drinking water) was a sovereign activity as to which the State has not waived immunity. Insofar as the notice of intention alleged breach of contract, the agreement expressly contemplated the possibility that warning labels would be required.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Chase Manhattan Bank, NA v. T & N PLC
...557 (1st Dep't 1991); Waters of Saratoga Springs, Inc. v. State, 116 A.D.2d 875, 498 N.Y.S.2d 196 (3d Dep't), aff'd, 68 N.Y.2d 777, 506 N.Y.S.2d 673, 498 N.E.2d 146 (1986). Whether a plaintiff should have discovered the alleged fraud is a mixed question of law and fact. See K & E Trading, 1......
-
Koch v. Christie's Int'l PLC, K. Pub. Ltd.
...N.Y.S.2d at 486;Waters of Saratoga Springs, Inc. v. New York, 116 A.D.2d 875, 498 N.Y.S.2d 196, 199 (1986), aff'd, 68 N.Y.2d 777, 506 N.Y.S.2d 673, 498 N.E.2d 146 (1986). Indeed, the standard applied in this Circuit with respect to inquiry notice in RICO and pre-Merck securities fraud cases......
-
N.Y. State Workers' Comp. Bd. v. Consol. Risk Servs., Inc.
...157 ; Waters of Saratoga Springs v. State of New York, 116 A.D.2d 875, 877–878, 498 N.Y.S.2d 196 [1986], affd. 68 N.Y.2d 777, 506 N.Y.S.2d 673, 498 N.E.2d 146 [1986] ).As regards CRS and its employees, Supreme Court determined that questions of fact exist regarding whether misconduct predat......
-
Anonymous v. Anonymous
...period exists (Waters of Saratoga Springs Inc. v. State of New York, 116 A.D.2d 875, 498 N.Y.S.2d 196 [1986] affd 68 N.Y.2d 777, 506 N.Y.S.2d 673, 498 N.E.2d 146 [1986]. Plaintiff argues that the Statute of Limitations has been tolled by virtue of her insanity disability (CPLR 208) 1 and al......