Waters v. Hatch
Decision Date | 29 March 1904 |
Citation | 181 Mo. 262,79 S.W. 916 |
Parties | WATERS v. HATCH et al. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
5. A clause of testator's will bequeathed 60 shares of Carthage National Bank stock, which was all the stock he owned in that corporation, and in the next clause he bequeathed 20 shares of Carthage National Bank stock. Testator owned 20 shares of Central National Bank stock. The whole will showed that there was no intention of intestacy as to property, and the residuum of the estate was left to testator's wife, for whom he provided specifically. Held, that the latter bequest should be construed to refer to the Central National Bank stock.
6. Testator's will provided that from the proceeds of a certain insurance policy certain bequests should be paid, the total of which amounted to within $100 of the face of the policy, and that his son should then be paid the "balance, $100." By reason of a payment on the policy after the will was made, and by reason of earnings of the company, the policy yielded a sum over its face value. Held, that the son was not entitled to the excess, the same not being a specific, or even a general, legacy.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Jasper County; Hugh Dabbs, Judge.
Suit by W. H. Waters, as executor of the will of W. H. Hatch, deceased, for a construction of the will. From the decree the defendant Frank B. Hatch appeals. Affirmed.
Howard Gray, for W. H. Waters. Shannon & Shannon, for Hatch. E. O. Brown and G. W. Crowder, for Vernon. Thomas & Hackney, for Flower.
This is an application in equity, by the executor of the last will and testament of W. H. Hatch, deceased, for a construction of the will. The widow and children of the deceased, who are also the legatees under the will, are the parties defendant. The will made no specific provision for the payment of debts, and the principal question involved is whether the demonstrative, the specific, or the general legacies, one or all, should contribute ratably to the payment of the debts and the expenses of administration. There are other questions of construction of the will which affect certain legacies and provisions of the will which will be noted in the course of the opinion.
The case made is this: W. H. Hatch lived in Carthage, Mo. His family consisted of his wife, who was over 70 years of age; his son, Frank B. Hatch, who was of age; and his two married daughters, Sarah M. Vernon, and Mary E. Flower. He owned a homestead, known as "Lot 26 of Lamb's Addition," worth $7,000, and of a rental value of $40 per month; and also a brick store building, located on a portion of lot 24, in Carthage, worth $10,000, on the north side of the square, wherein he carried on a clothing business under the name of the Boston Clothing Store. He also owned another business, which he carried on under the name of Economy Clothing Store, worth some $3,500. He owned 60 shares of the capital stock of the Carthage National Bank, and 20 shares of the capital stock of the Central National Bank. Besides this, he had insurance policies aggregating some $8,000. He employed his means separately in his several business ventures, and when he used money for any business that had not been set apart thereto he executed notes in the name under which he carried on the business to himself therefor. When he died he had on hand about $316.50 in cash, and when the business of the Boston Clothing Store was wound up by the executor it left $2,651.10 in the executor's hands, and these sums, together with $190 excess resulting from a policy of insurance for $4,000 in the Banker's Life Insurance Company, after paying $2,400 to the bank, which he owed as the Boston Clothing Store, and after paying $1,600 specific legacies, directed to be paid out of that fund, seems to have constituted the assets available to the payment of the debts and expenses of administration, without any deduction from the legacies for that purpose. The record does not show how much the debts of the estate amounted to, but all parties assume that said available fund is not sufficient to pay the debts, and that some or all of the legacies will have to contribute thereto, and the case will be so treated here.
For several months prior to April 13, 1898, W. H. Hatch was engaged in preparing his own will. The evidence is that he wrote and rewrote it very often. Finally, on the day aforesaid, he completed and executed his will, which is as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Niedringhaus v. William F. Niedringhaus Inv. Co.
... ... mismanagement and waste. The bequest of this stock to George ... W. Niedringhaus was a specific legacy. Waters v ... Hatch, 181 Mo. 262; In re Estate of Largue, 267 ... Mo. 104; Fidelity Natl. Bank v. Hovey, 5 S.W.2d 437; ... In re Calnane's Estate, ... ...
-
Adams v. Conqueror Trust Co.
...to buy any corporate stock. See also Fidelity National Bank & Trust Co. v. Hovey, supra; Waters v. Hatch et al., 181 Mo. 262, l.c. 288, 79 S.W. 916; In re Estate (Mo. App.), 28 S.W.2d 420. In the present case the testator, at the time of the execution of his will and at the time of his deat......
-
In re Bernheimer's Estate
...537; Booth v. Baptist Church, 126 N.Y. 215; Morris v. Garland, 78 Va. 215; Asbury v. Shain, 191 Mo.App. 667, 177 S.W. 666; Waters v. Hatch, 181 Mo. 262, 79 S.W. 916; In Estate of Largue, 267 Mo. 104, 183 S.W. 608; Meth. Episc. Church v. Thomas, 235 Mo.App. 671, 145 S.W.2d 157; Kelly v. Rich......
-
Buder v. Stocke
... ... 892, 177 A.D. 755; ... Collins v. Martin, 248 S.W. 941; Ballard v ... Carter, 22 Mass. 112, 16 Am. Dec. 377; Waters v ... Hatch, 181 Mo. 262, 79 S.W. 916; In re Martin, ... 25 R. I. 1, 54 A. 589; Kearns v. Kearns, 77 N.J.Eq ... 453; Mecum v. Stoughton, ... ...