Waters v. State, 37714

Decision Date09 June 1959
Docket NumberNo. 2,No. 37714,37714,2
Citation99 Ga.App. 727,109 S.E.2d 847
PartiesJ. V. WATERS v. STATE
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Lawson E. Thompson, Washington, Ga., for plaintiff in error.

J. Cecil Davis, Sol. Gen., Warrenton, Walton Hardin, Washington, Ga., for defendant in error.

Syllabus Opinion by the Court

TOWNSEND Judge.

1. 'If the father cannot properly provide for his child at the place where the mother lives, or if she should keep it at some other place, or if he desires the personal care of the child, he may himself obtain the custody of the child (if he be a more suitable person to be entrusted with its custody than its mother); but the child must be supported by its father, whether its mother has its custody or not. It is true that the abandonment which is penalized by law is voluntary abandonment, and it must appear that the father willingly withholds support from the child; but support and custody are not necessary concomitants. The father must support the child, whether it lives with him or not.' Parrish v. State, 10 Ga.App. 836, 838, 74 S.E. 445, 446. See also Hunt v. State, 93 Ga.App. 84, 91 S.E.2d 133.

2. On the trial of a criminal case the jury may accept or reject any part of the defendant's statement uncorroborated by other evidence as it may desire. Oppenheim v. State, 12 Ga.App. 480(2), 77 S.E. 652. Code, § 38-415.

3. The statement of this defendant on trial for the offense of abandonment of his minor child would, had the jury chosen to believe it, have established a complete defense. Disregarding such statement, however, the uncontradicted evidence showed the following: the prosecutrix and the defendant had been divorced for about a year and apparently no provision was made by the divorce decree for custody of their son who was about 16 years of age at the time; the boy elected to live with his mother; the mother fed and clothed him, sent him to school, and provided him with pocket money; the defendant gave the boy an overcoat for Christmas, arranged for him to have a charge account at a local restaurant which he used on occasion, and 'occasionally he has given him a dollar along, spending money, but he hasn't contributed anything to his support.' The primary obligation to support a child until it reaches majority remains, as it did at common law, upon the father. Logue v. State, 94 Ga.App. 777, 96 S.E.2d 209. The defendant in this case did, by providing the charge account at the restaurant, assure that his son would have food. However, Code § 74-9902 provides that the child...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Pasley v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • March 15, 1960
    ...836(2), 74 S.E. 445; Dyer v. State, 87 Ga.App. 440(2), 74 S.E.2d 129; Hunt v. State, 93 Ga.App. 84, 91 S.E.2d 133; Waters v. State, 99 Ga.App. 727, 109 S.E.2d 847. 2. The word 'child' used in a statute, will, deed, or other conveyance generally means a legitimate child, unless the context s......
  • Williamson v. State, 51092
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • March 18, 1976
    ...25 Ga. 696(1); Barrow v. State, 87 Ga.App. 572, 74 S.E.2d 467; Hunt v. State, 93 Ga.App. 84(1), 91 S.E.2d 133; Waters v. State, 99 Ga.App. 727, 728(3), 109 S.E.2d 847. 4. In this case, the parties were divorced on April 5, 1974, and at that time, certain provisions were made for the wife's ......
  • Moody v. State, 55256
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • April 25, 1978
    ...and custody are not necessarily concomitants. The father must support the child whether it lives with him or not." Waters v. State, 99 Ga.App. 727(1), 109 S.E.2d 847. In Williamson v. State, 138 Ga.App. 306, 307, 226 S.E.2d 102, 103 (the author of the present opinion dissenting), it was hel......
  • Browning v. State, 52262
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • June 17, 1976
    ...pp. 697, 699); Williamson v. State, 138 Ga.App. 306, 226 S.E.2d 102; Hunt v. State, 93 Ga.App. 84(1), 91 S.E.2d 133; Waters v. State, 99 Ga.App. 727, 728, 109 S.E.2d 847. 2. The second enumeration of error complains of the failure of the court to charge that if the defendant did not renew h......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT