Watson v. Alderson
Decision Date | 06 December 1898 |
Citation | 146 Mo. 333,48 S.W. 478 |
Parties | WATSON et al. v. ALDERSON et al. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
1. A judgment creditor, with liens on all the real estate owned by the debtors, levied on and purchased all the interest of the debtors in the real estate of which the father of the debtors soon afterwards died seised. The will of the father disinherited said debtors. Held, that the judgment creditor is "interested in the probate" of the will, within Rev. St. 1889, § 8888, so as to have the right to contest its validity.
2. The children of the testator, as his next of kin, may contest the validity of the will, as of common right, whether or not the result of the contest will be prejudicial to their pecuniary interests, within Rev. St. 1889, § 8888, because the administration of the goods of the testator ought to be committed to them, if he in fact died intestate.
In banc. Appeal from circuit court, St. Charles county; E. M. Hughes, Judge.
Suit by Mary A. Watson and others against David P. Alderson and others to contest the will of Benjamin A. Alderson, deceased. From a judgment sustaining a demurrer to the amended petition, plaintiffs appeal. Reversed.
H. C. Lackland and C. W. Wilson, for appellants. T. F. McDearmon, W. C. Scarritt, Theo. Bruere & Son, W. F. McEntire, and Frank Hagerman, for respondents.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the circuit court of St. Charles county sustaining a demurrer to plaintiffs' amended petition. On or about the 5th day of May, 1895, Benjamin A. Alderson, late of said county, deceased, departed this life, leaving surviving him, as his only heirs at law, his children, the plaintiffs Fannie A. Durell, Anna M. Weems, and R. F. Alderson, and the defendants, David P. Alderson, Samuel B. Alderson, Bettie G. Watkins, William A. Alderson, and Mabel H. Alderson. Afterwards, on the 15th of May, 1895, an instrument in writing was duly admitted to probate in the probate court of St. Charles county, as the last will and testament of said deceased, as follows:
Afterwards, on the 17th day of October, 1895, the plaintiff Mary A. Watson instituted this proceeding in the circuit court of St. Charles county by petition, in which the heirs at law aforesaid, of the said Benjamin A. Alderson, the wives of the said William A. and David P. Alderson, and the children of the said Bettie G. Watkins were made parties defendant. Afterwards, at the February term, 1896, of said court, and by leave thereof, an amended petition was filed, in which two of said heirs at law, viz. Fannie A. Durell and Anna M. Weems, and their husbands, were made parties plaintiff; and afterwards, at the August term, 1896, the petition, by leave of court, was further amended by interlineation, making another of said heirs at law (Robert F. Alderson) a party plaintiff. This amended petition, to which the demurrer was sustained, after setting forth said instrument of writing, the death of the said Benjamin A. Alderson, the death of his wife before his own death, the relationship of the aforesaid parties to him, and the probate of said instrument, alleges, in substance, that the said Benjamin A. Alderson died seised and possessed of certain real estate, described in the petition, situate in the said county of St. Charles; that on the 27th of February, 1892, the plaintiff Mary A. Watson obtained judgment against the defendant William A. Alderson in the circuit court of Jackson county, at Kansas City, in the sum of $4,192.52, and on the 12th day of January, 1893, obtained judgment against the defendant David P. Alderson in the same court in the sum of $1,873.45; that afterwards, on the 23d day of November, 1893, she caused transcripts of said judgments to be filed, entered upon the judgment docket, and recorded, as required by law, in the office of the clerk of the circuit court of the county of St. Charles, whereby the same became a lien upon all real estate owned by said defendants William A. and David P. Alderson in said county; that afterwards, on the 8th day of May, 1895, she caused executions to be issued on said judgments, which on the 18th of June, 1895, were levied upon all the right, title, and interest of the said William A. and David P. Alderson in and to the real estate aforesaid of which the said Benjamin P. Alderson died seised as aforesaid; that, in pursuance of a sale under said executions so levied, she afterwards, on the 30th of August, 1895, became the purchaser of all the right and title and interest aforesaid of the said William A. and David P. Alderson in and to said real estate, and thereafter received a sheriff's deed therefor, duly executed, acknowledged, and dated September 4, 1895; that said instrument of writing admitted to probate as aforesaid is not the last will and testament of the said Benjamin A. Alderson, and was not made and published as such, as required by law; that at the time of its execution the said Benjamin A. was of unsound mind and incapable of making a will; and that the execution thereof was procured by the undue influence of the said defendants William A., David B., and Samuel A. Alderson over the said Benjamin A., — and prays that an issue may be made up, whether said paper writing is or is not the will of said deceased, that the probate thereof be set aside, and the said paper be declared not to be the last will and testament of said deceased. The trial court, in sustaining the demurrer, held that the plaintiff Mary A. Watson, upon the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Duffy's Estate, 45138.
...majority rule are: Smith v. Bradstreet, 16 Pick. 264, 33 Mass. 264;In re Langevin's Will, 45 Minn. 429, 47 N.W. 1133;Watson v. Alderson, 146 Mo. 333, 48 S.W. 478, 69 Am.St.Rep. 615;Bloor v. Platt, 78 Ohio St. 46, 84 N.E. 604, 14 Ann.Cas. 332;Brooks v. Paine, 123 Ky. 271, 90 S.W. 600;In re C......
-
Ewart v. Dalby
...v. Frank, 267 Mo. 713, 718; State ex rel. v. McQuillin, 246 Mo. 674, 691; Teckenbrock v. McLaughlin, 246 Mo. 711, 719; Watson v. Alderson, 146 Mo. 333, 343.] It therefore follows that, unless the allegations of plaintiffs' petition herein disclose that plaintiffs have a direct pecuniary int......
-
In re Duffy's Estate
...or estoppel by laches. The heir may maintain the action because the right survives; the creditor because it is assignable." In Watson v. Alderson, supra, it appears that: A. Alderson died leaving only his children as heirs at law. On May 15, 1895 his purported will was admitted to probate. ......
-
Campbell v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.
...... this right with respect to anyone having an interest in its. exercise -- the heirs or devisees of the deceased. Edwards v. Watson, 258 Mo. 637, 167 S.W. 1119. (4). All persons materially interested, either legally or. beneficially, in the subject matter of the suit must be ... ecclesiastical courts in England. Woerner, Amer. Law of. Admin. (3 Ed.), secs. 137-140, 215; Watson v. Alderson, 146 Mo. 345, 48 S.W. 478. It is a suit in. rem operating directly upon the res. Benoist v. Murrin, 48 Mo. 52; Watson v. Alderson, 146 Mo. 344, 48 ......