Watts v. State
| Court | Alabama Court of Appeals |
| Citation | 109 So. 762,21 Ala.App. 516 |
| Docket Number | 6 Div. 997 |
| Parties | Troy WATTS v. STATE. |
| Decision Date | 08 June 1926 |
109 So. 762
21 Ala.App. 516
Troy WATTS
v.
STATE.
6 Div. 997
Court of Appeals of Alabama
June 8, 1926
Rehearing Denied Aug. 31, 1926
Appeal from Circuit Court, Tuscaloosa County; Henry B. Foster, Judge.
Wright & Clark, of Tuscaloosa, for appellant
Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., and Chas. H, Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
Certiorari denied by Supreme Court in Watts v. State, 109 So. 762.
[21 Ala.App. 517] SAMFORD, J.
The only question presented by this record is as to whether the county court of Tuscaloosa county was abolished upon the adoption of section 3800 of the Code of 1923, and it is conceded that this question has been passed upon by this court in Taylor v. State, 105 So. 915. We adhere to the ruling in the Taylor Case, supra, and upon authority of that case the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
King v. Uhlmann
...old one in force. 77 A.L.R.2d 336, 371; Allgood v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. (1916), 196 Ala. 500, 71 So. 724; Watts v. State (1926), 21 Ala.App. 516, 109 So. 762. The situation in the instant case is even stronger. The constitutional amendment adopted was to create an intermediate c......
-
Cabaniss v. City of Tuscaloosa
...... and he appeals. Affirmed. . . Certiorari. denied by Supreme Court in Cabaniss v. State, 109. So. 762. . . Reuben. H. Wright, of Tuscaloosa, for appellant. . . [21. Ala.App. 508] S.H. Sprott, of Tuscaloosa, ......
- Dailey v. State