Watts v. State

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
Citation109 So. 762,21 Ala.App. 516
Docket Number6 Div. 997
PartiesTroy WATTS v. STATE.
Decision Date08 June 1926

109 So. 762

21 Ala.App. 516


6 Div. 997

Court of Appeals of Alabama

June 8, 1926

Rehearing Denied Aug. 31, 1926

Appeal from Circuit Court, Tuscaloosa County; Henry B. Foster, Judge.

Wright & Clark, of Tuscaloosa, for appellant

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., and Chas. H, Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Certiorari denied by Supreme Court in Watts v. State, 109 So. 762.

[21 Ala.App. 517] SAMFORD, J.

The only question presented by this record is as to whether the county court of Tuscaloosa county was abolished upon the adoption of section 3800 of the Code of 1923, and it is conceded that this question has been passed upon by this court in Taylor v. State, 105 So. 915. We adhere to the ruling in the Taylor Case, supra, and upon authority of that case the judgment is affirmed.


To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • King v. Uhlmann
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Arizona
    • 7 Febrero 1968
    ...old one in force. 77 A.L.R.2d 336, 371; Allgood v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. (1916), 196 Ala. 500, 71 So. 724; Watts v. State (1926), 21 Ala.App. 516, 109 So. 762. The situation in the instant case is even stronger. The constitutional amendment adopted was to create an intermediate c......
  • Cabaniss v. City of Tuscaloosa
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • 15 Junio 1926
    ...... and he appeals. Affirmed. . . Certiorari. denied by Supreme Court in Cabaniss v. State, 109. So. 762. . . Reuben. H. Wright, of Tuscaloosa, for appellant. . . [21. Ala.App. 508] S.H. Sprott, of Tuscaloosa, ......
  • Dailey v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • 29 Junio 1926

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT