Watts v. State, A00A1084.
| Decision Date | 11 January 2002 |
| Docket Number | No. A00A1084.,A00A1084. |
| Citation | 558 S.E.2d 791,253 Ga. App. 227 |
| Parties | WATTS v. The STATE. |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
King, King & Jones, David H. Jones, Atlanta, for appellant.
Peter J. Skandalakis, Dist. Atty., Kevin W. Drummond, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee.
In Watts v. State,1 this Court affirmed the trial court's denial of Zane Watts' motion to suppress blood and hair samples obtained through a warrant.2 On certiorari, however, the Supreme Court of Georgia reversed.3 Accordingly, our prior judgment is vacated, and the judgment of the Supreme Court of Georgia is made the judgment of this Court. The judgment of the trial court is reversed.
Judgment reversed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
Watts v. State, No. A03A0929.
...two cases over the last twenty years.15 The failure to do so would appear to contradict the conclusory allegations permitted by the Court's Watts decision and confuse the Supreme Court's earlier bright-line (or, at least, brighter line) interpretation of OCGA § 17-5-30(b) as requiring that ......
-
Swindall v. Cox Enterprises, Inc.
... ... Thus, 558 S.E.2d 791 based on Swindall's state of mind at the time he testified to the grand jury, it is substantially true that he lied about ... ...