Watts v. Wheeler
Decision Date | 13 March 1895 |
Citation | 30 S.W. 297 |
Parties | WATTS et al. v. WHEELER. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from district court, Crosby county; W. R. McGill, Judge.
Action by Watts & Walker against J. H. Wheeler. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed.
D. B. Baker, for appellants. Joe E. Rosson and L. G. Wilson, for appellee.
Conclusions.
The land in controversy is public school survey No. 810, containing 640 acres, situated in Crosby county. This section was classified as "dry or pastoral land," and was by the commissioner of the general land office, on July 30, 1892, leased to appellants for the term of five years, in compliance with the act of April 28, 1891. Appellee being an actual settler upon agricultural school section No. 8, which adjoined the above No. 810, on November 23, 1892, made application in due form for the purchase of said last-named section, accompanied with the affidavit, bond, and first payment required by the statute. This application was refused by the commissioner, upon the ground that the prior lease to appellants prevented the sale. Appellants sued in trespass to try title, relying upon their lease; and appellee, in defense, specially pleaded his application to purchase, accompanied with the allegation that within four months after making the same he had taken actual possession, and placed improvements (a fence) thereon of value more than $100. The court below found in favor of appellee.
The provisions of the statute which are believed to control the question will be found in Supplement to Sayles' Texas Civil Statutes, and are as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Roxana Petroleum Corporation v. Colquitt
...Texas et al. (C. C. A. 5th Cir.) 272 F. 458; Williams v. United States, 138 U. S. 514, 11 S. Ct. 457, 34 L. Ed. 1026; Watts v. Wheeler, 10 Tex. Civ. App. 117, 30 S. W. 297. The fifth exception of defendants to the master's report and findings herein is to the effect that the master, in his ......
-
Chambers v. Rawls
...substitution, it must be held that the same was effected. Metzler v. Johnson, 1 Tex. Civ. App. 137, 20 S. W. 1116; Watts v. Wheeler, 10 Tex. Civ. App. 117, 30 S. W. 297. The Land Commissioner was vested with no discretion in the matter, and the only effect of his wrongful refusal to retain ......
-
Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. McGrew
...had no authority to refuse to make the award. Jumbo Cattle Co. v. Bacon; Burnett v. Winburn (Civ. App.) 25 S. W. 969; Watts v. Wheeler, 10 Tex. Civ. App. 117, 30 S. W. 297. If the award was required, and it was also necessary that Wiess make affidavit that the timber had not been removed, a......