Waxman v. Patabbe, Inc.

Decision Date07 February 2014
Docket NumberNo. 2012–1156K C.,2012–1156K C.
PartiesDorothy WAXMAN, Respondent, v. PATABBE, INC. Doing Business as Grimaldi's Pizzeria, Appellant, and “XYZ” Corp., Undertenant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Term

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Since the Civil Court lacked jurisdiction to grant the requested injunction, the order, insofar as appealed from, is reversed and the branch of landlord's cross motion seeking, in effect, to permanently enjoin tenant from removing a coal oven from the subject premises is denied.

ALIOTTA, J.P., PESCE and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Tobin v. Gluck
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • 28 Marzo 2014
    ...we are constrained to vacate the merits determination. Our disposition is without prejudice....”); see also Waxman v. Patabbe, Inc., No. 2012–1156, 42 Misc.3d 142(A), 2014 WL 683922, slip op. at 2 (App.Term. Feb. 7, 2014) (“Since the Civil Court lacked jurisdiction to grant the requested in......
  • Tobin v. Gluck
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • 28 Marzo 2014
    ...to vacate the merits determination. Our disposition is without prejudice....”); see also Waxman v. Patabbe, Inc., No. 2012–1156, 42 Misc.3d 142(A), 2014 WL 683922, slip op. at 2 (App.Term. Feb. 7, 2014) (“Since the Civil Court lacked jurisdiction to grant the requested injunction, the order......
  • Ross v. 120 N. James St. Corp.
    • United States
    • New York County Court
    • 21 Diciembre 2015
    ...title or possession to real property seeks to enjoin another from committing waste or damage to the premises. See, Waxman v. Patabbe, 42 Misc.3d 142(A), App. Term 2d, 11th & 13th Jud. Dists. (2014). See, Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law §211 ("If, during the pendency of an action t......
  • 133 Plus 24 Sanford Ave. Realty Corp. v. Xiu Lan Ni
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Term
    • 23 Febrero 2015
    ...settled that injunctive relief is generally not available in a summary proceeding brought in the Civil Court” (Waxman v. Patabbe, Inc., 42 Misc.3d 142[A], 2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 50221[U], *1, 2014 WL 683922 [App Term, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud. Dists. 2014] ; see North Waterside Redevelopment Co. v. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT