Wayne County Bd. of Ed. v. Lewis
| Decision Date | 29 March 1950 |
| Docket Number | No. 242,242 |
| Citation | 58 S.E.2d 725,231 N.C. 661 |
| Parties | WAYNE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION et al. v. LEWIS et al. |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Fred P. Parker, Jr.; Dees & Dees and J. Faison Thompson, Goldsboro, for plaintiffs.
J. C. B. Ehringhaus, Jr., Raleigh; J. A. Jones; Weston O. Reed and Thomas B. Griffin Kinston, for defendants.
The defendants take the position that since Wayne County Board of Education owns a six acre site on which the Mount Olive High School is located, and the proposed site for an elementary school adjoins the high school site, the Board was only authorized by the statute, G.S. § 115-85, to condemn an additional acreage which together with the present high school site would not exceed ten acres.
We do not construe the limitation in the statute to place any such restriction on a county board of education. The high school site and the proposed site for a new elementary school, constitute separate school sites, and the mere fact that they adjoin is incidental.
There is no limitation on the acreage which may be purchased or donated for a school site. The limitation applies only where the site, or any part thereof, must be obtained by condemnation. In such cases, the land owned, donated or purchased, together with the adjacent lands to be condemned, shall not exceed ten acres. Board of Education v. Pegram, 197 N.C. 33, 147 S.E. 622; Board of Education v. Forrest, 190 N.C. 753, 130 S.E. 621. We do not interpret the statute to prohibit the location of a high school and an elementary school on adjoining sites. However, neither site may contain more than ten acres of land, if any part thereof must be obtained by condemnation.
In view of our interpretation of the provisions of G.S. § 115-85, and its application to the facts in this case, the right of the Wayne County Board of Education to the possession of the premises in controversy follows as a matter of law; and any discussion of its right to have the court issue a writ of assistance, in order for it to obtain possession of such land, would be purely academic.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Painter v. Wake County Bd. of Ed.
...Board of Education, 267 N.C. 438, 148 S.E.2d 513 (1966); Feezor v. Siceloff, 232 N.C. 563, 61 S.E.2d 714 (1950); Board of Education v. Lewis, 231 N.C. 661, 58 S.E.2d 725 (1950); Waldrop v. Hodges, 230 N.C. 370, 53 S.E.2d 263 (1949); Atkins v. McAden, 229 N.C. 752, 51 S.E.2d 484 (1949); Boar......
-
Parker v. Anson County
...67 S.E.2d 647; Atkins v. McAden, 229 N.C. 752, 51 S.E.2d 484; Johnson v. Marrow, 228 N.C. 58, 44 S.E.2d 468; Wayne County Board of Education v. Lewis, 231 N.C. 661, 58 S.E.2d 725; Kreeger v. Drummond, 235 N.C. 8, 68 S.E.2d 800; Edwards v. Board of Education, 235 N.C. 345, 70 S.E.2d 170; Ree......
-
Dilday v. Beaufort County Bd. of Ed., 38
...absent a manifest abuse of discretion or a disregard of law. Feezor v. Siceloff, 232 N.C. 563, 61 S.E.2d 714; Wayne County Board of Education v. Lewis, 231 N.C. 661, 58 S.E.2d 725; Waldrop v. Hodges, 230 N.C. 370, 53 S.E.2d 263; Atkins v. McAden, 229 N.C. 752, 51 S.E.2d Each year the board ......
-
Lutz v. Gaston County Bd. of Ed. of Gaston County
...of discretion. Dilday v. Board of Education, 267 N.C. 438, 148 S.E.2d 513 (1966); Feezor v. Siceloff, supra; Board of Education v. Lewis, 231 N.C. 661, 58 S.E.2d 725 (1950); Waldrop v. Hodges, 230 N.C. 370, 53 S.E.2d 263 (1949); Aikins v. McAden, 229 N.C. 752, 51 S.E.2d 484 (1948). In deter......