Wear v. McCorkle
| Decision Date | 30 April 1826 |
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
| Parties | WEAR v. MCCORKLE |
Covenant for rent; judgment for defendant in the court below. The first point made is on the plaintiff's demurrer to the defendant's third plea. On the argument of this point, it is alleged, that the plaintiff's first count in the declaration is bad. We are of that opinion, because the breaches are badly assigned. The second point is, did the court err in the instruction given to the jury on this point? We think the court did err; but because, on the whole record, the court gave judgment for the right party, the judgment must be affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
9 cases
-
Vogg v. Missouri Pacific Railway Company
... ... 207; Gray v. Railroad, 64 Mo. 47; Sparling ... v. Conway, 75 Mo. 510; Frick v. Railroad, 75 ... Mo. 595-610; Tate v. Barcroft, 1 Mo. 163; Wear ... v. McCorkle, 1 Mo. 588; Swearingen v. Orine, 8 ... Mo. 707; Garesche v. Deane, 40 Mo. 168; Hedecker ... v. Ganzhorn, 50 Mo. 154; Dunbar v ... ...
-
Patterson v. Evans
...v. Railroad, 196 Mo. 550; Peterson v. Transit Co., 199 Mo. 331; Crocker v. Mann, 3 Mo. 473; Gillespie v. Hendren, 98 Mo.App. 622; Wear v. McCorkle, 1 Mo. 588; Ittner Hughes, 133 Mo. 679; Homuth v. Railroad, 129 Mo. 629; Fritz v. Railroad, 243 Mo. 62; Cook v. Printing Co., 227 Mo. 471; Lipsc......
-
Dunlap v. Kelly
... ... error on the ground that the judgment was for the right ... party. Tate v. Barcroft, 1 Mo. 163; Wear v ... McCorkle, 1 Mo. 588; Swearengen v. Orne, 8 Mo ... 707; Garesche v. Deane, 40 Mo. 168; Hedecker v ... Granzorn, 50 Mo. 154; Dunbar v ... ...
-
Linz v. Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. Co.
...whole record, the Supreme Court will not reverse the case though error has been committed.-- Tate v. Bancroft, 1 Mo. 163; Wear v. McCorkle, 1 Mo. 588; Crocker v. Mann, 3 Mo. 472; Orth v. Dorschlein, 32 Mo. 366. Even though improper evidence has been admitted.-- Gar esché v. Dean, 40 Mo. 168......
Request a trial to view additional results