Weatherington v. Moore, 77-2059.

Decision Date14 March 1977
Docket NumberNo. 77-2059.,77-2059.
Citation431 F. Supp. 515
PartiesMilburn WEATHERINGTON, Petitioner, v. Richard N. MOORE, United States Marshal for the Western District of Tennessee, et al., Respondents.
CourtU.S. District Court — Western District of Tennessee

Joe A. Dycus, Asst. Federal Defender, Memphis, Tenn., for petitioner.

Devon L. Gosnell, Asst. U. S. Atty., Memphis, Tenn., for respondents.

ORDER ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

McRAE, District Judge.

On January 28, 1977, a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(1) and (3), was filed in behalf of Milburn Weatherington by the Public Defender in this District.

Petitioner is presently incarcerated in the Shelby County Jail, Memphis, Tennessee, in the custody of Richard N. Moore, United States Marshal for the Western District of Tennessee, pursuant to a parole violation warrant issued by J. Robert Cooper, Commissioner for the Southeast Region of the United States Parole Commission, a division of the United States Department of Justice.

Petitioner was placed in the Shelby County Jail on or about 28 October 1976 by a deputy United States Marshal, and petitioner has remained there since that time.

Petitioner was sentenced on 14 January 1954 by a United States District Judge for the Western District of Tennessee to twenty (20) years imprisonment for bank robbery.

Petitioner was paroled on 10 March 1964.

In November 1971, petitioner's parole was revoked because he had been convicted of a driving while intoxicated charge in Savannah, Tennessee, on 19 September 1971 and because he was arrested for attempted arson on 11 October 1971; petitioner was returned to a federal penitentiary.

The law in effect at that time provided:

A warrant for the retaking of any United States prisoner who has violated his parole, may be issued only by the Board of Parole or a member thereof and within the maximum term or terms for which he was sentenced. The unexpired term of imprisonment of any such prisoner shall begin to run from the date he is returned to the custody of the Attorney General under said warrant, and the time the prisoner was on parole shall not diminish the time he was sentenced to serve. 18 U.S.C. § 4205.

Petitioner was re-paroled on 15 May 1972, with his sentence having a new expiration date of 22 September 1981.

On 15 March 1976 the United States Congress passed into law the Parole Commission and Reorganization Act of 18 U.S.C. §§ 4201-4218, Pub.Law 94-233, 90 Stat. 219, which took effect on 14 May 1976, sixty (60) days after passage.

18 U.S.C. § 4210(b) of the new act provides:

. . . The jurisdiction of the Commission over the parolee shall terminate no later than the date of the expiration of the maximum term or terms for which he was sentenced. . . .

It is argued in behalf of the petitioner that the maximum term for which he was sentenced expired in 1974, twenty (20) calendar years after the judge sentenced him, and that the Parole Commission lost jurisdiction over him for all purposes, custodial and supervisory, on 14 May 1976, the effective date of 18 U.S.C. § 4210(b).

On the other hand it is argued in behalf of the government that the 1971 parole revocation extended the term of the sentence of the petitioner until 1981; therefore the parole authorities had jurisdiction to revoke his parole in January 1977.

Under the former law, 18 U.S.C. § 4205, the maximum term or terms for the purpose of telling when the retaking warrant must have issued was the full length of the sentence from the date of its imposition by the Court, without...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • State ex rel. Hauser v. Carballo
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • January 3, 1978
    ...Rept. No. 94-838, 1976 U.S.Code and Cong. & Admin.News 351, 364; Daniels v. Farkas, 417 F.Supp. 793 (D.C.Cal.1976); Weatherington v. Moore, 431 F.Supp. 515 (W.D.Tenn.1977)."Time spent under parole supervision until the date of the violation for which parole is revoked should be credited aga......
  • Weatherington v. Moore, 77-1194
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • June 6, 1978
    ...original sentence expiration date has been extended prior to the effective date of this enactment. In an order published at 431 F.Supp. 515 (W.D.Tenn.1977), District Judge Robert M. McRae, Jr., concluded that the statute should not be given retroactive effect and denied the petition for a w......
  • White v. Warden, U.S. Penitentiary
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • November 15, 1977
    ...its problem neatly by reducing the sentence to time served. We have also considered the latest case we have found: Weatherington v. Moore, 431 F.Supp. 515 (W.D.Tenn.) (decided March 14, 1977). There the court "18 U.S.C. § 4210(b) of the new act provides: ". . . (T)he jurisdiction of the Com......
  • U.S. ex rel. Pullia v. Luther, 80-1204
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit
    • December 2, 1980
    ...at 61. The court found significant the earlier decisions in Daniels v. Farkas, 417 F.Supp. 793 (C.D.Cal.1976) and Weatherington v. Moore, 431 F.Supp. 515 (W.D.Tenn.1977), (later affirmed 577 F.2d 1073 (6th Cir. 1978)). Daniels and Weatherington had both raised similar issues concerning the ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT