Weathers v. Williams
Decision Date | 08 July 1938 |
Citation | 182 So. 764,133 Fla. 367 |
Parties | WEATHERS v. WILLIAMS, Sheriff. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Rehearing Denied July 26, 1938.
Extraordinary Petition for Rehearing Denied Aug. 1, 1938.
Suit by J. F. Weathers against H. T. Williams, as Sheriff of Brevard County, Florida, for a temporary restraining order enjoining defendant from seizing or interfering with the operation of certain pin ball machines and other devices belonging to plaintiff. From an order denying the restraining order plaintiff appeals.
Affirmed. Appeal from Circuit Court, Brevard County; M B. Smith, judge.
Walter A. Shelley and Grant & Luther, all of Daytona Beach, and H H. Wells and B. K. Roberts, both of Tallahassee, for appellant.
George Couper Gibbs, Atty. Gen., Tyrus A. Norwood, Asst. Atty. Gen and Lloyd F. Boyle, Asst. State Atty., of Sanford, for appellee.
J. F. Weathers exhibited his Bill of Complaint in the Circuit Court of the Ninth Judicial Circuit in and for Brevard County in which he alleged:
It is then alleged that H. T. Williams is the duty elected, qualified, and acting Sheriff of Brevard County, Florida, and that he has deputized as certain deputy sheriffs, servants, agents and employees various individuals, the number and names being unknown to the plaintiff, who are authorized under the statutes to act in the name of the Sheriff and who are responsible to the Sheriff for their conduct in the sheriff's office, and that under the provisions of Section 4578, C.G.L. 1927, the Sheriff is responsible for the neglect and default of such deputies, servants and employees.
It is alleged that under the provisions of Chapter 18143, Acts of 1937, operation of machines commonly known as slot machines is made unlawful and the operation of such is prohibited.
The bill then pleads the provisions of Sec. 2 of Chapter 18143, supra, and of sections 3 and 4 of the same Act.
It alleges that section 5 of the Act provides for the destruction of the machines, apparatus and device under certain conditions.
It is then alleged:
'That, in and by section 7664 [7665], Compiled General Laws of Florida, 1927, it is provided as follows: 'The sheriff or any peace or police officer, when any of the implements, devices or apparatus commonly used for gambling purposes are found in any house, room, booth or other place, used for the purpose of gambling, shall seize the same and hold them subject to the discretion of the court, to be used as evidence, and afterwards the same shall be publicly destroyed in the presence of witnesses under order of the court to that effect.”
And it further alleged:
'That the Sheriff of Brevard County, Florida, through his deputies, has personally advised said plaintiff that he will, on the 15th day of June A. D. 1938, seize and confiscate the plaintiff's said machines, above described, as slot machines and gambling devices; that, therefore, unless said Sheriff and his deputies are instanter enjoined as hereinafter prayed, all of said plaintiff's, 'Pace's Races', 'Keeny's Track Time', 'Exhibits Races', 'El Toro Bumper', 'Chico Derby' 'Bobs' and 'Long Beach' machines above described, will be seized and confiscated by the Sheriff and/or his deputies, arbitrarily and without authority, on the ground that the said constitute slot machines and gambling devices; that, by reason of such action and threats on the part of said Sheriff and his deputies, said plaintiff will be deprived of property without due process of law, his duly licensed business destroyed, and the value of said machines and the proceeds therefrom will be forever lost to said plaintiff, whereby said plaintiff will suffer immediate and irreparable injury, loss and damages, before notice can be served and a hearing had thereon, in violation of the Constitution of the United States; that the injury apprehended will be done if an immediate remedy by way of a restraining order is not afforded.'
The bill prays for temporary restraining order, as follows:
'1. That this Honorable Court will forthwith grant to the Plaintiff a temporary restraining order herein enjoining and restraining said H. T. Williams, as Sheriff of Brevard County, Florida, and his successors in office, and their deputies, servants, assistants, agents and/or employees, from seizing, confiscating, molesting, taking, or in any manner interfering...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Eccles v. Stone
...... same class and character as the 'marble pin games'. which we. [183 So. 630] . had under consideration in the case of Weathers v. Williams, as Sheriff, 182 So. 764, and as to which we. said [page 769]:. . . 'Now,. if the machine is adapted for use in such a way ......
-
Pasternack v. Bennett
...... and the Act held valid and effective as against the. challenges presented in those cases. See Weathers v. Williams, 133 Fla. 367, 182 So. 764; Bechtol v. Lee, 129 Fla. 374, 176 So. 265; Eccles v. Stone,. Fla., 183 So. 628, 630. . . It ......
-
Moss v. Graves
...... thing of value.'. . . This. court has construed this law heretofore in Weathers v. Williams, 133 Fla. 367, 182 So. 764, and in Eccles. v. Stone, 134 Fla. 113, 183 So. 628. . . The. obvious purpose of the act is to ......
-
People v. One Slot Mach. Owned by Telequiz Corp.
...cash prize or the loss of the coin inserted in the machine. This necessarily is a violation of the quoted statute. See Weathers v. Williams, 133 Fla. 367, 182 So. 764; Eccles v. Stone, 134 Fla. 113, 183 So. 628. The question is made known only after the coin has been inserted in the 'The al......