Weaver v. McClintock Trunkey Co., 28117.
| Decision Date | 30 June 1941 |
| Docket Number | 28117. |
| Citation | 8 Wn.2d 154,114 P.2d 1004 |
| Parties | WEAVER et ux. v. McCLINTOCK-TRUNKEY CO. |
| Court | Washington Supreme Court |
On rehearing.
Adhering to opinion in 111 P.2d 570.
Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County; Chas. W. Greenough, judge.
E. A. Cornelius, of Spokane, for appellant.
H. E. T. Herman and Richard S. Munter, both of Spokane, for respondents.
Upon a rehearing en banc, a majority of the court adheres to the en banc opinion heretofore filed herein, and reported in 111 P.2d 570.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Hauswirth v. Pom-Arleau
...Fetterman v. Levitch, 7 Wash.2d 431, 109 P.2d 1064; Weaver v. McClintock-Trunkey Co., Wash., 111 P.2d 570, affirmed on rehearing, Wash., 114 P.2d 1004. In Hefner case, supra [1 Wash.2d 607, 96 P.2d 587], we said: 'It must be borne in mind that respondent [plaintiff] testified that when he s......
-
Langer v. Auto Interurban Co.
...v. Levitch, 7 Wash.2d 431, 109 P.2d 1064; Weaver v. McClintock-Trunkey Co., Wash. [2d 154], 111 P.2d 570, affirmed on rehearing, Wash. 114 P.2d 1004.' We followed the above rule in Miller Asbury, 13 Wash.2d 533, 125 P.2d 652, and Bleiler v. Wolff, 23 Wash.2d 368, 161 P.2d 145. In Gavin v. E......
-
Boyle v. Lewis
...of Carlson, if any, being imputed to respondent. We stated in Weaver v. McClintock-Trunkey Co., 8 Wash.2d 154, 161, 111 P.2d 570, 573, 114 P.2d 1004: if, as counsel for appellant insists, the operator of the automobile in which respondent wife was riding [she was riding as a guest in a car ......
-
Sandberg v. Spoelstra
...v. Tacoma Moving & Storage Co., 1930, 155 Wash. 628, 285 P. 667; Weaver v. McClintock-Trunkey Co., 1941, 8 Wash.2d 154, 111 P.2d 570, 114 P.2d 1004; Wheaton v. Stuck, 1949, 34 Wash.2d 725, 209 P.2d The testimony was widely divergent. Plaintiff's driver testified that the defendants' truck d......