Weber v. Perry
Decision Date | 09 July 1942 |
Docket Number | 15442. |
Parties | WEBER v. PERRY. |
Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
Appeal from Common Pleas Court, of Orangeburg County; G. B. Greene Judge.
Action by G. L. Weber against W. E. Perry to recover damages for alleged breach of an oral contract of employment. From a judgment overruling a demurrer to the complaint, defendant appeals.
Order of Judge Greene:
This action was commenced on or about the 28th day of August 1941, to recover damages for the alleged breach of an oral contract of employment. In due time, the defendant filed a demurrer to the complaint which came on to be heard before me at the October Term of the Court. At that time, I took the questions presented under advisement.
In brief, the complaint alleges the following facts pertinent to the issues before me:
In the fall of 1938, plaintiff, who is an expert in farm management was induced by the defendant to abandon an established business in the State of Michigan and to move with his family to the State of South Carolina, there to undertake the management and development of a large plantation for the defendant. The terms of the contract under which this was done are set forth in the complaint as follows:
According to the allegations of the complaint, the plaintiff fully performed the contract on his part and successfully managed and developed the farm; but, on or about the 5th day of August, 1941, he was notified by the defendant that his employment would not be continued after September 1, 1941.
The grounds of the demurrer are as follows:
The First Ground.
There can be no dispute as to the well established principle that the statute applies only to those contracts which are impossible of performance within a year and that a contract on a contingency which may occur within the year need not be supported by a writing.
This rule has a particular application to contracts of employment for an indefinite term or on a contingency.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Lewis v. Minnesota Mut. Life Ins. Co.
...A.2d 245, 248, affirmed 355 Pa. 79, 48 A.2d 857; Millsap v. National Funding Corp., 57 Cal.App.2d 772, 135 P.2d 407, 409; Weber v. Perry, 201 S.C. 8, 21 S.E.2d 193, 195; see also C.J.S., Master and Servant § 8c, pages 78-79. Defendants would distinguish the cases above cited on the ground t......
-
Toth v. Square D Co.
...to duration only if additional consideration is given. Orsini v. Trojan Steel Corp., 219 S.C. 272, 64 S.E.2d 878 (1951); Weber v. Perry, 201 S.C. 8, 21 S.E.2d 193 (1942). Small was an appeal from an order refusing the employer's motion for directed verdict on the ground the evidence establi......