Weeks v. Esch, 76-589
Decision Date | 16 June 1977 |
Docket Number | No. 76-589,76-589 |
Citation | 568 P.2d 494,39 Colo.App. 428 |
Parties | Kathleen B. WEEKS and Earl V. Buchanan, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Virginia A. ESCH, Defendant-Appellant. . III |
Court | Colorado Court of Appeals |
Spurgeon, Haney & Howbert, P. C., Gregory R. Piche, Colorado Springs, for plaintiffs-appellees.
Addy, Otto & Stauffer, J. Kent Stauffer, Colorado Springs, for defendant-appellant.
In this intra-family dispute, plaintiffs, Kathleen Weeks and Earl Buchanan, sued their sister, Virginia Esch, and were successful in having the trial court impose a constructive trust on certain real estate and bank accounts. We affirm.
In 1970, three years prior to her death, Annabelle Buchanan, the widowed mother of the parties, owned two homes, the "Bijou" property and the "Cascade" property. She also had money deposited in several banks. Two of her three children, the plaintiffs, lived in California, and one, the defendant, resided in close proximity to her Colorado Springs home. The defendant assisted her aged and infirm mother in personal and financial affairs. The plaintiffs telephoned their mother weekly and visited her annually. The record demonstrates that a close relationship existed between the mother and all of her children.
Being in failing health, anticipating the possibility of becoming incapacitated, and desiring to avoid the cost of probate, the mother transferred ownership of all of her property, real and personal, to herself and her daughter, the defendant, in joint tenancy.
In 1972, the mother sold the Bijou property and, despite the title interest of the defendant, divided the proceeds from the sale equally among herself and her three children. Also, her will specified equal division of her estate.
A few days before the mother's death, and allegedly at the mother's direction, the defendant withdrew the money on deposit in the joint bank accounts and deposited it into her own account. It is her contention that the Cascade property was not intended to be shared equally by all of the children and she refused to distribute the proceeds of the bank accounts pending disposition of the question of ownership of the Cascade property. The defendant did, nonetheless, share equally with her brother and sister some $10,000 in cash which she found hidden throughout the mother's home.
Based upon testimony of the parties, which was in direct conflict, but also based on tape recordings of conversations between defendant and her mother, and plaintiff Weeks and her mother, the trial court found that the mother transferred the property to defendant intending for defendant to divide all property equally among all of her children. The court also held that a confidential relationship existed between the defendant and her mother, and, accordingly, ruled that defendant held the property under a constructive trust.
Defendant's first contention on appeal is that the necessary elements of a constructive trust had not been proved. We do not agree.
As stated in Restatement (Second) of Trusts § 45:
We find this Restatement approach to be persuasive and follow it. See Gruenwald v. Mason, 139 Colo. 1, 335...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
United States v. Reed
...754, 136 Cal.Rptr. 815, 818 (1977) (mother entrusted to son money and powers of negotiation in business affairs); Weeks v. Esch, 39 Colo.App. 428, 568 P.2d 494, 495 (1977) (daughter assisted aged and infirm mother in personal and financial affairs and enjoyed very close relationship with mo......
-
Lewis v. Lewis
...791 P.2d 1198 (Colo.App.1989) (holding that a confidential relationship may exist between a doctor and patient); Weeks v. Esch, 39 Colo. App. 428, 568 P.2d 494, 496 (1977) (holding that a confidential relationship may exist between family members giving rise to constructive Further, in vari......
-
Sandstead-Corona v. Sandstead
...with the understanding that the child would share the property with his or her siblings after the parent died. See Weeks v. Esch, 39 Colo.App. 428, 568 P.2d 494, 495 (1977). In Weeks, a mother, in an attempt to avoid probate, transferred ownership of all of her property, real and personal, ......
-
Meyer v. Schwartz, 80CA1271
...the fact that Martyn and Edith were brother and sister does not establish a per se fiduciary relationship. See Weeks v. Esch, 39 Colo.App. 428, 568 P.2d 494 (1977). Accordingly, the record would not support a conclusion that, when Edith and Martyn were negotiating the property distribution,......
-
Chapter 8 - § 8.7 • TRUSTS
...fraud, nor the existence of a fiduciary relationship need be shown. Page v. Clark, 197 Colo. 306, 592 P.2d 792 (1979); Weeks v. Esch, 39 Colo. App. 428, 568 P.2d 494 (1977). However, something more than a mere creditor-debtor relationship must be proved. . . . There must be a relationship o......
-
Chapter 9 - § 9.3 • ELEMENTS DEFINED
...exists between parties to nuptial agreements with each having responsibility to act with good faith and fairness to other); Weeks v. Esch, 568 P.2d 494, 496 (Colo. App. 1977) (confidential relationship existed between mother and daughter). See also Marshall v. Grauberger, 796 P.2d 34, 36 (C......
-
Chapter 55 - § 55.5 • CONSTRUCTIVE TRUSTS
...of a constructive trust, at least under the facts presented. Scott v. Boma Inv. Co., 72 P.2d 274, 275 (Colo. 1937); Weeks v. Esch, 568 P.2d 494, 496 (Colo. App. 1977); In re Specialized Installers, 12 B.R. at 553 (stating that neither fraud nor a fiduciary relationship is required). One cas......
-
Chapter 55 - § 55.5 • CONSTRUCTIVE TRUSTS
...of a constructive trust, at least under the facts presented. Scott v. Boma Inv. Co., 72 P.2d 274, 275 (Colo. 1937); Weeks v. Esch, 568 P.2d 494, 496 (Colo. App. 1977); In re Specialized Installers, 12 B.R. at 553 (stating that neither fraud nor a fiduciary relationship is required). One cas......