Weeks v. State
| Decision Date | 15 August 1967 |
| Docket Number | No. 66--925,66--925 |
| Citation | 201 So.2d 764 |
| Parties | Matthew WEEKS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender and Marvin J. Emory, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Barry N. Semet, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before CHARLES CARROLL, C.J., BARKDULL, J., and LOPEZ, AQUILINO, Jr., Associate Judge.
On this appeal by the defendant below from an order denying his second motion for relief under Criminal Procedure Rule 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix from convictions and sentences on two informations charging him with robbery, to which he pleaded guilty, we have considered the several grounds on which it is contended on behalf of the appellant that his guilty pleas were improperly induced and were involuntary, and find them to be without merit.
The allegations in the motion relating to lack of counsel or improper representation by counsel and as to promises which his private counsel made to him as to the result to be expected from a guilty plea, were submitted in a prior motion for relief under Criminal Procedure Rule 1. See Weeks v. State, Fla.App.1964, 168 So.2d 587. Appellant's contention that his guilty pleas were involuntary because he had previously confessed does not furnish a basis for relief under the present motion. See Taylor v. State, Fla.App.1964, 169 So.2d 861; Thompson v. State, Fla.App.1965, 176 So.2d 564, 567; Clayton v. State, Fla.App.1966, 188 So.2d 395; Brown v. State, Fla.App.1966, 190 So.2d 405.
The order appealed from is affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Nova v. State, 82-1766
...So.2d 207 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966), and cases collected therein; Lawson v. State, 231 So.2d 205; Richardson v. State, 202 So.2d 137; Weeks v. State, 201 So.2d 764; Hall v. State, 183 So.2d 277. No matter how many prior applications for collateral relief a prisoner has made, the prisoner is entitl......
-
Lawson v. State
...the same allegation has been raised and rejected in prior motions. Echols v. State, 210 So.2d 13 (Fla.App.2d 1968); Weeks v. State, 201 So.2d 764 (Fla.App.3d 1967); Taylor v. State, 183 So.2d 865 (Fla.App.3d 1966). However, in the case Sub judice, the previous denials were authorized under ......
-
Grant v. State, 68--479
...will not be considered. Fields v. State, Fla.App.1967, 202 So.2d 226; Richardson v. State, Fla.App.1967, 202 So.2d 137; Weeks v. State, Fla.App.1967, 201 So.2d 764; Wells v. State, Fla.App.1967, 197 So.2d 20; Cameron v. State, Fla.App.1967, 196 So.2d 182; Mitchell v. State, Fla.App.1967, 20......
-
Ford v. State
...confession or confessions is not sufficient reason to relief under Rule 1. Coleman v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 854; Weeks v. State, Fla.App.1967, 201 So.2d 764. And, as stated in Hand v. State, Fla.App.1968, 208 So.2d 307, released March 20, 1968, '* * * he cannot properly be heard in......