Welch v. Norman

Citation722 N.Y.S.2d 264,282 A.D.2d 448
PartiesSEAN WELCH, Respondent,<BR>v.<BR>ROBERT L. NORMAN et al., Defendants, and STEPHEN M. FAUGHNAN et al., Appellants.
Decision Date02 April 2001
CourtNew York Supreme Court Appellate Division

O'Brien, J. P., Friedmann, Goldstein and Smith, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The defendant Robert L. Norman was driving on Gramatan Avenue in Mount Vernon when his vehicle collided with a van making a left turn at the intersection with Lincoln Avenue. The van was operated by the appellant Stephen M. Faughnan and owned by the appellant Union County Florist Supply. As a result of the collision, Norman's car was propelled into the air and landed on a sidewalk, injuring the plaintiff, a pedestrian.

The Supreme Court properly denied the appellants' motion for summary judgment, as they failed to meet their burden of establishing prima facie that they were not negligent. Further, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment against the appellants on the issue of liability. The evidence in the record established that Faughnan was negligent as a matter of law in making a left turn in front of Norman's oncoming vehicle (see, Smalley v McCarthy, 254 AD2d 478; Mattera v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 245 AD2d 274; Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1141). The evidence relied on by the appellants was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to their lack of liability.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Shmarkatyuk v. Chouchereba
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 19 Febrero 2002
    ...failed to demonstrate a meritorious defense to the action (see, Agin v Rehfeldt, 284 A.D.2d 352, lv denied 97 N.Y.2d 603; Welch v Norman, 282 A.D.2d 448; Stiles v County of Dutchess, 278 A.D.2d ALTMAN, J.P., SMITH, KRAUSMAN, McGINITY and COZIER, JJ., concur. ...
  • Eaker v. Long Island Am. Water Co.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 21 Diciembre 2010
    ...the subject water main ( see De Witt Props. v. City of New York, 44 N.Y.2d 417, 424, 406 N.Y.S.2d 16, 377 N.E.2d 461; Welch v. Norman, 282 A.D.2d 448, 449, 722 N.Y.S.2d 264). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint,......
  • Cadeau v. Gregorio
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 12 Marzo 2013
    ...the collision ( seeVehicle & Traffic Law § 1141; Moreback v. Mesquita, 17 A.D.3d 420, 793 N.Y.S.2d 148 [2d Dept. 2005];Welch v. Norman, 282 A.D.2d 448, 722 N.Y.S.2d 264 [2d Dept. 2001];Stiles v. County of Dutchess, 278 A.D.2d 304, 305, 717 N.Y.S.2d 325 [2d Dept. 2000] ). Tyne and the injure......
  • Corvino v. Schineller
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New York)
    • 8 Febrero 2017
    ...of way. See Hyo Jin Yoon v. Guang Chen, 127 AD3d 1023 (2d Dept. 2015); Griffin v Pennoyer, 49 AD3d 341 (1st Dept. 2008); Welch v Norman, 282 A.D.2d 448 (2d Dept. 2001); Stiles v County of Dutchess, 278 A.D.2d 304 (2d Dept. 2000); Canceleno v Johnston, 264 A.D.2d 405 (2d Dept. 1999). She has......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT