WELL-BILT PRODUCTS, INC. v. Hawkins, 35014.
| Decision Date | 27 May 1966 |
| Docket Number | No. 35014.,35014. |
| Parties | WELL-BILT PRODUCTS, INC., and Shelby Mutual Insurance Company, Petitioners, v. Thomas E. HAWKINS and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Welsh, Cornell, Carlton & Walsh, Miami, and Charles R. Cuddy, Key Biscayne, for petitioners.
George F. Taylor, Jr., of Spencer & Taylor, Miami, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date November 16, 1965.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.
It is further ordered that a fee of $250. be awarded to the attorney for the respondent.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Swartz v. McDonald's Corp.
... ... these factors, the court in El Viejo Arco Iris, Inc. v. Luaces, 395 So.2d 225 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), held that ... Likewise, in Tampa Airport Hilton Hotel v. Hawkins, 557 So.2d 953 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), the court ... ...
- Griffith v. Budget Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc.
-
Tampa Airport Hilton Hotel v. Hawkins
... ... The Employer/Carrier relies on El Viejo Arco Iris, Inc. v. Luaces, 395 So.2d 225 (Fla. 1 DCA 1981) and Tampa Ship Repair and Dry ... ...
- Nikko Gold Coast Cruises v. Gulliford