Wellington v. Inhabitants of Belmont
| Decision Date | 21 June 1895 |
| Citation | 41 N.E. 62,164 Mass. 142 |
| Parties | WELLINGTON v. INHABITANTS OF TOWN OF BELMONT. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
H. Wardwell, for plaintiff.
J.S. Goodrich and J.S. Richardson, for defendant.
The plaintiff was an inhabitant of Belmont, and was assessed there for the building and machinery as personal property. She was also assessed for them as personal property in Salem, where they were situated. If any part of the property, assuming it all to be personal, was property taxable to her in Belmont, this action cannot be maintained. In such a case the remedy of the party aggrieved is by an application for abatement, and not by a suit at law to recover the alleged excess. Bourne v. City of Boston, 2 Gray, 494; Richardson v. City of Boston, 148 Mass. 508, 20 N.E. 166. It is admitted in substance that the plaintiff was taxable in Belmont, unless the building and machinery were employed in manufacturing, within the meaning of Pub.St. c. 11,§ 20, cl. 2. [1] The business carried on was "that of quarrying and breaking stone to be used in macadamizing roads and for other similar purposes" and the building and machinery were used in it. We do not see that the business of quarrying stone and breaking it up for use on roads and other similar purposes is any more a manufacturing business than mining coal and breaking it up into merchantable sizes, or farming and cutting ice. Byers v. Coal Co., 106 Mass. 131; Hittinger v. Westford, 135 Mass. 258; Ingram v. Cowles, 150 Mass. 155, 23 N.E. 48. Quarrying and dressing granite could hardly be said to be manufacturing it, though moulding clay into different sizes and shapes and then burning it fairly may be said to be manufacturing brick. Still less could simply crushing granite into smaller and smaller pieces be said to constitute manufacturing, as that word is ordinarily used, though there is a remote sense in which it may be true. We think that the ruling of the court was right, and that according to the report there must be judgment for the defendants, and it is so ordered.
---------
Notes:
[1] Pub.St. c. 11, § 20, cl. 2, provides that all personal property shall be assessed to the owner in the city or town where he is an inhabitant on May 1st, except all machinery employed in any branch of manufactures, which shall be assessed where it is situated or employed.
---------
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Wertheimer Bag Co.
...T. Dyer Quarry Co., 250 Pa. 589, 95 A. 797; Commonwealth v. Welsh Mt. Mining & Kaolin Mfg. Co., 265 Pa. 380, 108 A. 722; Wellington v. Belmont, 164 Mass. 142, 41 N.E. 62; Inhabitants of Leeds v. Maine Crushed Rock & Gravel Co., 127 Me. 51, 141 A. 73(5); see also 10 A.L.R. 1307, § We think i......
-
Solite Corp. v. King George County
...233 N.W. 682, 684-86 (1930); Leeds v. Maine Crushed Rock & Gravel Co., 127 Me. 51, 56-58, 141 A. 73, 75 (1928); Wellington v. Belmont, 164 Mass. 142, 41 N.E. 62 (1895); People ex rel. Tompkins Cove Stone Co. v. Saxe, 176 App.Div. 1, 5-6, 162 N.Y.S. 408, 411 (1916), Aff'd mem., 221 N.Y. 601,......
-
Assessors of Boston v. Commissioner of Corporations and Taxation
...of Lykens Valley, 106 Mass. 131; the cutting and storing of ice, Hittinger v. Westford, 135 Mass. 258; the quarrying of stone, Wellington v. Belmont, 164 Mass. 142; the of a newspaper, Barron v. Boston, 187 Mass. 168; and the production and transmission of artificial sound waves by a teleph......
-
Boston & M.R.R. v. Town of Billerica
...storing manufactured goods (Stone v. Howard Ins. Co., 153 Mass. 475, 27 N. E. 6,11 L. R. A. 771), quarrying stone (Wellington v. Belmont, 164 Mass. 142, 41 N. E. 62), printing a newspaper (Barron v. Boston, 187 Mass. 168, 72 N. E. 951;Evening Journal Ass'n v. State Board of Assessors, 47 N.......