Wells v. Kuhn
Decision Date | 10 April 1920 |
Docket Number | No. 20824.,20824. |
Parties | WELLS et al. v. KUHN et al. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Linn County; Fred Lamb, Judge.
Suit by Ella Wells and others against Martha A. Kuhn and others. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed.
E. B. Fields, of Browning, for appellants.
A. W. Mullins, of Linneus, C. C. Bigger, of Laclede, and H. J. West, of Brookfield, for respondents.
Suit in equity to set aside a deed and for partition. The plaintiffs are the collateral heirs of W. S. Goslin, deceased. The defendants are the widow and heirs of S. C. Kuhn, deceased. In 1901, Goslin, a widower, owned 135 acres of land in Linn county. On that date he conveyed it to Maggie Kuhn, his daughter, who was his only child and who was the wife of S. C. Kuhn. Goslin made his home with his daughter and her husband. In 1903, Maggie Kuhn died, intestate, and without issue. On September 21st, following her death, Goslin executed a quitclaim deed to Kuhn, her surviving husband, the granting and habendum clauses of which are as follows:
On the 2d day of September, 1915, Goslin executed a warranty deed, purporting to convey the same land to Kuhn. It is in the usual form with the exception of a recital therein, which is as follows:
This last deed is the one sought to be set aside. Goslin died December 14, 1915, and Kuhn on March 29, 1916.
Kuhn married again within two or three years after the death of his first wife, Maggie, but Goslin continued to live with him the remainder of his life. He was treated kindly and considerately by Kuhn and his last wife; he was happy and contented in their home, which they made his home as well; and he had, apparently, the same affectionate regard for Kuhn as he would have had, had he been his own son. All his life he had been regarded as a rather frail man physically, and this condition was more pronounced during the latter part; but up to the time of his death in his eighty-fourth year he was able to travel around in his community with a horse and buggy unattended. He was a man of average intellect and education, and there had been no impairment of his mind, except the loss of vigor usual in extreme old age. Until his death he continued to personally transact whatever business he had. With reference to the cordial, even affectionate, relation existing between Kuhn and Goslin, and the mental and physical condition of the latter up to the time of his death, the evidence runs all one way.
The petition alleges that the plaintiffs are the owners of one undivided half of the land in...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Clark v. Skinner
...(2 Ed.), p. 1624, sec. 438; Masterson v. Sheahan, 186 S.W. 526; Wimpey v. Ledford, 177 S.W. 303; Ellis v. McNally, 177 S.W. 659; Wells v. Kuhn, 221 S.W. 19; Chambers v. Chambers, 227 Mo. 287; Goodman v. Griffith, 142 S.W. 263; Melvin v. Hoffman, 235 S.W. 115; Blackiston v. Russell, 44 S.W. ......
-
Blackiston v. Russell, 29983.
...not be avoided except for mistake, fraud, duress, undue influence or other cause. [Chambers v. Chambers, 227 Mo. l.c. 287; Wells v. Kuhn, 221 S.W. 19; Melvin v. Hoffman, 235 S.W. 107; Palmer v. Palmer, 238 S.W. The decree of the trial court is therefore affirmed. Ferguson and Sturgis, CC., ......
-
Deitz v. Deitz
...the consideration was inadequate merely, or entirely lacking in fact." Clark v. Skinner, 334 Mo. 1190, 70 S.W. (2d) 1094; Wells v. Kuhn, 221 S.W. 19; Masterson v. Sheahan, 186 S.W. 524; Chambers v. Chambers, 227 Mo. 262, 127 S.W. 86; Holmes v. Fresh, 9 Mo. 201. (6) A promise though made wit......
-
Clark v. Skinner
... ... 1624, ... sec. 438; Masterson v. Sheahan, 186 S.W. 526; ... Wimpey v. Ledford, 177 S.W. 303; Ellis v ... McNally, 177 S.W. 659; Wells v. Kuhn, 221 S.W ... 19; Chambers v. Chambers, 227 Mo. 287; Goodman ... v. Griffith, 142 S.W. 263; Melvin v. Hoffman, ... 235 S.W. 115; ... ...