Welts v. Caldwell
| Decision Date | 11 June 1954 |
| Citation | 331 Mass. 499,120 N.E.2d 280 |
| Parties | WELTS et al. v. CALDWELL. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Charles H. Walters, Boston, for plaintiff.
Alfred Lo Presti, Boston, Paul J. Donaher, Dorchester, for defendant.
Before QUA, C. J., and LUMMUS, SPALDING, WILLIAMS and COUNIHAN, JJ.
Richard A. Welts, a minor, hereinafter called the plaintiff, brings this action of tort to recover for personal injuries received by falling from the defendant's automobile on Edge Hill Road in Milton. His father, Harry Welts, seeks to recover medical expenses. Of the four counts in the declaration verdicts were ordered for the defendant on the first, which charged ordinary negligence, and on the third, which charged wilful, wanton and reckless misconduct. The jury returned verdicts for the plaintiffs on the second and fourth wherein it was alleged that the defendant was guilty of gross negligence. The defendant excepted to the denial of his motion for directed verdicts on these counts.
The accident in which the plaintiff was injured occurred about 10 p. m. on February 18, 1949. On that evening he had been working as a pin boy in a bowling alley operated by the Cunningham Foundation. The defendant, who was the director of the Foundation, left the alley at closing time with several of the pin boys and went to his automobile to drive home. There was evidence that the plaintiff, who was fourteen years of age, and another boy named Douglas were then standing on the rear bumper of the automobile. The defendant said nothing to the plaintiff but entered the automobile with three other boys whom he had offered to drive home and started to drive around the circular driveway in front of the Foundation building. The plaintiff and Douglas remained on the rear bumper. The driveway was constructed of asphalt and led to Edge Hill Road. Where it joined the road it extended into and formed part of the sidewalk. It went 'down a little' where it joined the street. There was no curbston. The plaintiff testified that in proceeding around the driveway 'the motor vehicle travelled at maybe 10 miles an hour * * *; that when Mr. Caldwell approached Edge Hill Road, he slowed down to almost a stop or five miles an hour and that after 'he swerved the car, you know, to make a left hand turn and as he stepped on the gas, [the plaintiff] felt himself thrown off to the right hand side'; that there was a bump in the road as you enter onto the street; that this almost happened combined, the bump, left hand turn, the acceleration, and his flying off.' The plaintiff previously had ridden on the rear bumper of the defendant's automobile four or five times and had not been told that he could not do so. The defendant testified that the boys were not on the bumper when he entered the automobile but that, before he reached Edge Hill Road, he learned from one of the boys in the automobile that they were standing...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Bagley v. Burkholder
...264; Ruel v. Langelier, 299 Mass. 240, 242, 12 N.E.2d 735; Donahue v. Kelley, 306 Mass. 511, 513-514, 29 N.E.2d 10; Welts v. Caldwell, 331 Mass. 499, 500-501, 120 N.E.2d 280. However, B, the recipient of the benefit, owes to A the duty of exercising ordinary care for A's safety. See Taylor ......
-
DeJoseph v. Faraone
...Law and Practice (3rd Ed.) § 416.1, p. 11--12. See also Lincoln v. Knudsen, 163 Neb. 390, 79 N.W.2d 716 (1956) and Welts v. Caldwell, 331 Mass. 499, 120 N.E.2d 280 (1954). For statutes using language essentially identical to Delaware's Guest Statute, see Welty's Estate v. Wolf's Estate, 345......
-
Sharick v. Marvin
...by judicial decisions and not by statute, she can recover against her host only on proof of gross negligence. Welts v. Caldwell, 331 Mass. 499, 120 N.E.2d 280; Altman v. Aronson, 231 Mass. 588, 121 N.E. 505, 4 A.L.R. 1185; Massaletti v. Fitzroy, 228 Mass. 487, 118 N.E. 168, L.R.A. 1918C, 26......