Wescon, Inc. v. Morgan

Decision Date09 August 1985
Citation699 S.W.2d 556
PartiesWESCON, INC., Kenneth P. Whaley, d/b/a Whaley Construction Company and Parks Electric Service, Incorporated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Ron MORGAN, Harlan Newton and Robert N. Hatfield, Defendants-Appellants.
CourtTennessee Court of Appeals

L. Anderson Galyon, III and Brian H. Trammell of Kennerly, Montgomery & Finley, Knoxville, for defendants-appellants.

R.N. Child and George Worman, Jr., Knoxville, for plaintiffs-appellees.

OPINION

FRANKS, Judge.

In this action, the trial court entered judgment against the three individual defendants for improvements plaintiffs made on a camp site in Knox County. Defendants have appealed.

Essentially, the facts as found by the chancellor are not in dispute except as they relate to Robert Hatfield, hereinafter discussed.

From our review, we conclude the evidence does not preponderate against the chancellor's findings of fact pertinent to the issues, which we adopt:

The three plaintiffs, namely Wescon, Whaley and Parks, seek a judgment against Messrs. Morgan, Newton and Hatfield, and Hatfield, Inc., for improvements made to certain real property, and prejudgment interest....

* * *

At the request of Mr. Morgan, Parks had done maintenance work on King's Plaza Shopping Center in the past, prior to the times involved in this case, for Ackerman and Company which maintained the shopping center.

In December, 1981, or January, 1982, Mr. Morgan approached Mr. Parks in regard to improvements to the real property owned by Associates for a World's Fair campsite. On that occasion Mr. Parks recommended that Mr. Morgan contact J.M. Widner, a civil engineer.

Mr. Morgan later contacted Mr. Widner by phone, and Mr. Widner met at Mr. Widner's office with Mr. Morgan and Mr. Newton on or about February 17 or 18, 1982. Mr. Widner was employed to prepare field plans for a recreational vehicle park on Associates' real property. At this time, Mr. Widner thought that Messrs. Morgan and Newton were partners, and was advised that other partners were involved, namely Mr. Hatfield and a Mr. Bob Peters from Florida.

* * *

At some point in time, Mr. Widner was asked by Messrs. Morgan and Newton to secure bid proposals for the work to be done.

Mr. Widner contacted the three (3) plaintiffs, and from information submitted by them prepared bid proposals, ...

* * *

On March 13, 1982, Mr. Widner went to Atlanta, Georgia, where he met with Mr. Morgan and submitted to him the three (3) bid proposals of the plaintiffs, which had been signed by the plaintiffs.

* * *

On March 16, 1982, Messrs. Morgan and Newton met with Mr. Widner at his office. Mr. H. Wesley Peters of Wescon was also present. On that occasion, Mr. Morgan okayed or accepted the plaintiffs' bid proposals by signing as an individual each one. There is no mention on the approved bid proposals of a corporation.

Mr. Morgan instructed Mr. Widner to notify the plaintiffs of the bid proposal acceptance. At this time, Mr. Widner was paid $2092.00, the balance of his charges, by check drawn on the account of Five Mile Camp Sites, Inc., which account had been opened that same day. Mr. Widner in turn wrote a receipt to Five Mile Camp Sites, Inc.

* * *

On March 16, 1982, Five Mile Camp Sites, Inc., was incorporated under the laws of the State of Georgia, "To own, lease, acquire, maintain and operate recreational vehicle campsites wherever located; to do all things incidental to operation such campsites ..." It remains a viable corporation in the State of Georgia, but has never been domesticated as a foreign corporation in the State of Tennessee.

Mr. Widner was employed to layout lots, act as supervisor and inspector, and generally look after the project. He was directed to obtain a building permit in the name of Mr. Morgan, and to show the name on the drawing or plat as Five Mile Recreational Vehicle Park. The property was five (5) miles from the World's Fair site.

Mr. Widner never told the plaintiffs that they were working for a corporation and was never instructed to do so. Instead, in the beginning, he advised that Messrs. Morgan, Newton and Hatfield were partners.

* * *

The first time Mr. Hatfield met with Mr. Widner was on April 27, 1982, and he never came into contact with the plaintiffs until after May 1, 1982. However, Mr. Hatfield was the president and member of the board of Five Mile Camp Sites, Inc., and Messrs. Morgan and Newton were also officers or directors.

Mr. Morgan was on the job site on a monthly basis. When he received Parks' proposal on March 19, 1982, it did not have corporation shown thereon. Mr. Morgan basically states that he does not remember telling Parks or Whaley that there was a partnership. He denies being in partnership with Messrs. Newton and Hatfield, although ... a computer printout pertaining to reservations shows Messrs. Morgan and Newton as owner. Mr. Morgan admits failing to tell the plaintiffs the corporate mailing address.

Mr. Newton was involved with Mr. Morgan from the beginning. Mr. Hatfield later got involved as an investor. Mr. Newton testified that the corporation was formed to limit their individual liability in case of failure. He was the on-site manager for approximately six (6) weeks or until the project was abandoned in June or July, 1982.

* * *

The preponderance of the evidence indicates that it was never disclosed to any of the plaintiffs that the individual defendants were acting on behalf of the Georgia Corporation, until they received the checks dated April 27, 1982,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Masters Entm't Grp. v. Aurich
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Tennessee
    • 14 juin 2022
    ... 1 MASTERS ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, v. DALE AURICH and BOBBY L. RABER, d/b/a HUMVEE DESIGNS, Defendant. No ... Agreement was executed. (Doc. No. 61 at 7) ... [ 27 ] See Wescon, Inc. v. Morgan , ... 699 S.W.2d 556, 559 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1985) (noting that the ... ...
  • Cackowski v. Drake
    • United States
    • Tennessee Court of Appeals
    • 11 janvier 2023
    ...involving an undisclosed agency, the third party may sue either the principal or the agent, but not both."); Wescon, Inc. v. Morgan, 699 S.W.2d 556, 559 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1985) ("If an officer or agent of a corporation enters into a contract without disclosing the fact that he is acting for t......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT