Wesson v. Horner

Decision Date31 March 1857
CitationWesson v. Horner, 25 Mo. 81 (Mo. 1857)
PartiesWESSON et al., Respondents, v. HORNER et al., Appellants.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

1. To constitute an enforceable contract it must be founded on a valuable consideration, and be certain and definite in its terms.

Appeal from St. Louis Court of Common Pleas.

This was a suit by attachment founded on a promissory note. The answer admitted the execution of the note, but alleged, by way of defense, in substance, that the plaintiffs and defendants, and divers other creditors of defendants, consulted together in relation to the indebtedness of the defendants to the plaintiffs and the other creditors; that it was understood and agreed between the defendants and those other creditors that they would forbear and give time to defendants to pay the several debts owing to them, and would sell them goods to enable them to prosecute their trade and business as merchants, provided the plaintiffs would not annoy, harass and disturb them, or in any way prevent them from so doing; that the plaintiffs agreed that if said creditors would sell goods to defendants, they would not sue, attach, or in any other way detain or harass them in prosecuting their business as merchants; that divers of these other creditors did sell defendants goods on credit, to the amount of $8,000, the sales being based on said agreement, and with the understanding that the plaintiffs would not sue, or in any way harass the defendants; that this suit was in violation of the agreement. Defendants pray that proceedings may be restrained until a reasonable time has elapsed to enable them to dispose of said goods.

A motion was made and sustained for judgment as for want of an answer.

Hudson & Thomas, for appellants.

N. Holmes, for respondents.

I. No agreement is stated in the answer with such certainty as to be capable of being interpreted and enforced...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
12 cases
  • Davis v. Holloway
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • May 24, 1927
    ... ... Trust Co., 302 Mo. 235; State ex rel. v ... Robertson, 191 S.W. 991; Strange v. Crowley, 91 ... Mo. 287; Green v. Cole, 103 Mo. 76; Wesson v ... Horner, 25 Mo. 81. (3) The evidence utterly fails to ... show a meeting of the minds of the parties in an agreement ... complete and ... ...
  • Shofler v. Jordan
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • December 6, 1955
    ...capable of being rendered certain through application of the ordinary canons of construction or by reference to something certain [Wesson v. Horner, 25 Mo. 81; Bay v. Bedwell, Mo.App., 21 S.W.2d 203, 205(1); Hubbard v. Turner Department Store Co., 220 Mo.App. 95, 278 S.W. 1060, 1061(3); Bur......
  • Smith v. Crane
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • March 3, 1913
    ... ... It must be such that Smith ... could have recovered on in court, had his rights accrued ... Burks v. Stam, 65 Mo.App. 455; Wesson v ... Horner, 25 Mo. 81; 9 Cyc. 248. (2) The court was right ... in excluding the evidence of Mrs. Richardson and Arthur ... Morrison for two ... ...
  • Swift v. Central Union Fire Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • December 1, 1919
    ...and expressly pleaded." See also Hart v. Harrison Wire Company, 91 Mo. 414, 4 S.W. 123 et seq.; McNulty v. Collins, 7 Mo. 69; Wesson v. Horner, 25 Mo. 81. In latter case the answer pleaded an alleged contract or agreement. To this agreement the plaintiff made the point that no consideration......
  • Get Started for Free