West v. Grand Lodge A. O. U. W. of Texas
Decision Date | 07 October 1896 |
Citation | 37 S.W. 966 |
Parties | WEST et al. v. GRAND LODGE OF THE ANCIENT ORDER OF UNITED WORKMEN OF TEXAS.<SMALL><SUP>1</SUP></SMALL> |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from district court, Bexar county; Robert B. Green, Judge.
Action by Duval West, administrator of the estate of Benjamin Cleghorn, deceased, against the Grand Lodge of the Ancient Order of United Workmen of Texas, on a certificate of life insurance. Hattie St. Clair intervened. From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff and intervener appeal. Affirmed.
Hines & Bee, for appellants. W. S. Robson and J. T. Duncan, for appellee. John A. Green, Jr., for intervener.
Duval West, administrator of the estate of Benjamin Cleghorn, deceased, sued appellee, the Grand Lodge of the Ancient Order of United Workmen, to recover the sum of $2,000, alleged to be due on a certificate of life insurance issued to said Cleghorn. Hattie St. Clair intervened in the suit, alleging that the certificate was payable to the order of Cleghorn on his application that it be so made, and further stated "that, seven years prior to the time when the said Cleghorn made his application for membership to said Milan Lodge No. 2, the wife of the said Cleghorn had abandoned him, with the intention of never returning to him, and said wife died in the year 1885, leaving no issue; that in the year 1880 the said Benjamin Cleghorn, deceased, proposed to this intervener, who was then a young single woman, of twenty-three years of age, that if she would keep house for him, attend to his physical and temporal wants and needs, see to the preparation of his food, and that his clothing was kept neat and in good repair, do all his washing, nurse him in sickness, and occupy the position of wife to him during the remainder of his life, that he (the said Cleghorn) would care for, maintain, and entirely support the said intervener during his life, and would insure his life for the sum of two thousand dollars, and make the said insurance payable to the said intervener at his death; that said intervener consented to such an arrangement, and make a contract with the said deceased containing the said terms, and bound herself to said deceased to carry out the same." It is further stated that intervener carried out her part of the agreement, and was dependent upon Cleghorn for her maintenance and support; that, at his death, he left no wife or children or other relative, and had no one except intervener dependent upon him for support; and "that, prior to his death, the said Benjamin Cleghorn, deceased, in accordance with his contract so to do, made, executed, and delivered to this intervener an order, in writing, upon the said Ancient Order of United Workmen, defendant, making the amount of said benefit certificate payable to intervener." Appellee answered that the deceased had bound himself to obey the by-laws and regulations of the institution; that an order had been passed that all certificates payable to order should be surrendered for cancellation, and notice was served on Cleghorn to surrender his certificate, and receive one in which the beneficiary should be designated; and that he had failed and refused to obey said order, and thereby forfeited his right as a member, and, if he ever had any right to assign the certificate, it had been lost. It was also answered that Hattie St. Clair had been the concubine of Cleghorn for many years, and that she was not a dependent as intended by the rules of the order; that the administrator could not recover, because the life insurance, under the rules of the order, was no part of the estate of Cleghorn, but, in the absence of any relative or dependent, the same reverted to the order.
The facts show that appellee is a voluntary benevolent association, and, by complying with all the rules of the association, each member is entitled to a benefit certificate, and to name a beneficiary, who, upon the death of the member, will receive the sum of $2,000. Benjamin Cleghorn became a member of the association on May 7, 1883, and applied for and obtained a certificate of insurance for $2,000, payable to his order. In his application, he pledged himself to be bound by and comply with all the rules, regulations, and laws of the associations as they then were, and as they were changed or altered from time to time thereafter. The regulations of the association required that the $2,000 should go to a designated member of his family or blood relative or a dependent.
It is provided by the laws of the order as follows:
It is further provided:
In 1888 notices were sent to all members who had certificates payable to order, by appellee, to send their certificates in compliance with law, to be changed, and that they should be made payable to some one of the class designated who was named by the member holding the certificate. Cleghorn, though notified, did not comply with the order. Cleghorn, at time of the issuance of the certificate, had a lawful wife living, who was afterwards divorced from him, and died in 1885. At the time of the issuance of the certificate, Cleghorn was living in adultery with Hattie St. Clair, and was not living with his wife. Cleghorn did not designate any person to whom the insurance was to be paid, and left no will or testament. The relation between Cleghorn and Hattie St. Clair was that of man and concubine, which continued for many years, and up to the time of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Stevens v. Woodmen of the World
... ... operating under the lodge system. The cause was tried before ... the court sitting without a jury, ... beyond our jurisdiction to protect this confessed harlot? ... West v. Grand Lodge, 14 Tex.Civ.App. 471, 37 S.W ... 966. "The courts never ... ...
-
Wirtz v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W.
...of the association, or are not against public policy. This proposition is supported by the following authorities: West v. A. O. U. W., 14 Tex. Civ. App. 471, 37 S. W. 966; United Moderns v. Colligan, 34 Tex. Civ. App. 173, 77 S. W. 1032; Sovereign Camp, etc., v. Hicks, 37 Tex. Civ. App. 424......
-
Jovich v. National Croatian Society of United States of America, 2076
... ... 569; Johnson v. Knights of Honor (Ark.) 13 ... S.W. 794; Supreme Lodge v. Terrell, 99 F. 330 ... By-laws of a fraternal insurance organization ... 61; Stoelker v. Thornton (Ala.) 6 L. R. A ... 140; Obrist v. Grand Lodge of Kansas (Kan.) 256 P ... 955; Styles v. Byrne (Mont.) 296 P ... 113; Gregory v ... Sovereign Camp (S. C.) 89 S.E. 391; West v. Grand Lodge ... (Tex.) 37 S.W. 966 ... RINER, ... Chief ... ...
-
Baker v. Mosaic Templars of America
...as provided in the policy. The heirs can not recover. 10 F. 227; Acts 1917, Act 462, § 6. 2. The clause is not against public policy. 37 S.W. 966. 3. clause is not ambiguous, indefinite nor uncertain. 202 Mass. 85. 4. There being no designated beneficiary, the fund lapsed and reverted to th......