West v. State

Decision Date20 January 1976
Docket Number1 Div. 598
Citation329 So.2d 653,57 Ala.App. 596
PartiesGlen WEST v. STATE.
CourtAlabama Court of Criminal Appeals

Calvin Clay, Mobile, for appellant.

William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen. and C. Lawson Little, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

LEIGH, M. CLARK, Supernumerary Circuit Judge.

Appellant was convicted of murder in the second degree of Billy Dannelley on an indictment charging him with murder in the first degree. The jury fixed his punishment at twenty-five years imprisonment in the penitentiary, and he was sentenced accordingly.

The single issue between the parties as presented by their briefs on appeal is whether the trial court should be reversed for its submission to the jury of the question of the guilt or innocence of defendant, over defendant's protest, as made by his motion to exclude the evidence at the conclusion of the evidence for the State and his written request for the affirmative charge in his favor at the conclusion of the evidence for both sides.

The body of Dannelley was found in Carter County, Tennessee, on Friday, March 29, 1974; a bedspread with bloodstains on it was found near the body; the cause of death was determined to be the result of a blow on the head by a blunt instrument, fist, or feet; there were lacerations over the face and other portions of the body.

A witness for the State testified that about 12:15 A.M. Wednesday, March 27, he was awakened by people going in the door of Dannelley's apartment which adjoined the apartment of the witness. He said he later heard what sounded like a fight and scuffling. He identified two of the participants as Dannelley and James West, Jr., brother of appellant. The witness knew Dannelley and James West, Jr., who were living together at Dannelley's apartment. He could not identify the third person. The witness said that he heard Dannelley say, 'Please don't. Stop him,' and later, 'Oh my God.' He said he heard the third person, whom he could not identify, say, 'Let him wipe up the blood,' and that later he heard someone say, after the scuffling had stopped, 'Well, let me get my car keys,' but that he could not determine who said the last quoted words. Thereafter he heard the people leave the apartment.

Dannelley did not report for work on March 27. He was a teacher in a school of an adjacent county. He lived in Mobile County. Out of concern for him, his apartment was entered by his brother about 10:00 A.M. March 27. His brother testified he saw blood and hair in the kitchen; garbage was turned over in the kitchen; the kitchen window was broken; there was blood in the bathroom and hair in the bedroom; the bedspread was missing from the bed in the bedroom. The glass of the front door had been broken and four window panes were broken. He testified that his brother, the deceased, was a homesexual. He testified that the bedspread that was missing from his brother's apartment was like the bedspread that had been found with bloodstains on it near his brother's body in Tennessee. He further testified that the bedspread that had been on his brother's bed was not thereafter found in the apartment.

Defendant did not testify, but his father testified that on March 24, 1974, his wife and appellant came to Mobile from Raeford, North Carolina, where they had been living; that about 7:00 A.M., March 27, appellant and James West, Jr., came to their father to borrow money; that at that time they were in the automobile of Billy Dannelley; that Dannelley's dogs were in the car; that appellant and his brother, James West, Jr., left after he had cashed a check and given them fifty dollars, that, 'My son said he was going home. My son Glen.'

James West, Jr., was the principal witness for defendant. He testified that he and Bill Dannelley had gone to North Carolina in Dannelley's automobile and brought Glen and his mother to Mobile; that he and Glen and Dannelley were together several times and during the evening of March 26, they went over to the 'Goldenrod,' and left there about midnight. He said they took Glen to his dad's apartment and then he and Dannelley went to Dannelley's apartment. He testified that thereafter while the two were at Dannelley's apartment an argument ensued between them about some women and Dannelley got mad and swung at him. The witness then hit Dannelley, Dannelley stumbled over a trash can and his head hit the window in the door. His nose was bleeding and he went to the bathroom and put some cold rags on it; Dannelley's nose was bleeding profusely. They then decided to ride around; they went to McNally Park over on Dauphin Island Parkway; they sat out there on rocks and drank beer; they had Dannelley's puppies in the automobile; they were gone three or four hours; he drove Dannelley back to Dannelley's apartment and then went to his father's apartment and 'woke Glen up.' His father and mother had spent the night with their daughter. He and Glen thereafter went to the paint store where his father worked and borrowed fifty dollars. He and Glen went to McNally Park and drank some beer. Glen had told him that he was going back to North Carolina. He and Glen went to Dannelley's apartment; Glen stayed in the car. James and Dannelley then took Glen out on the causeway to Buck's Truck Stop and let him out of the car to catch a ride to North Carolina about 10:00 A.M. James and Dannelley then went to Dauphine Island. They 'goofed off and drank beer.' They stayed there a couple of hours. They discussed going back to the causeway to see 'if Glen caught a ride yet.' They came back to Dannelley's apartment and James 'got some clothes.' He said, 'We consequently went to North Carolina,' arriving there about midnight that night. They went into a wooded area and 'that is when Dannelley became suddenly violent.' They had a fight in which Dannelley was using a knife; he kicked Dannelley under the chin and Dannelley fell against the car bumper; Dannelley appeared to be dead. James loaded Dannelley in the trunk of the car and drove to Carter County, Tennessee, and rolled his body in the ravine where it was afterwards found. He returned to his former home in Raeford, North Carolina. He denied that his brother, Glen West, had had any part in the fight with Dannelley in Dannelley's apartment or in the fight with Dannelley in North Carolina. He denied that appellant was with the two on either occasion or on any part of the trip from Mobile to North Carolina or therefrom to Tennessee where the body was 'rolled out in the ravine' at a 'rubbage dump . . . right off the side of the road.' James said that the next time he saw Glen was 'when he came back down here (Mobile) to jail.'

Counsel for appellant has submitted a creditable and comprehensive brief on the subject of the sufficiency of evidence to warrant a verdict of guilty in a criminal case, particularly an unlawful homicide case, and more particularly when such a case is based solely on circumstantial evidence. The authorities cited support and emphasize the position that defendant is entitled to the presumption of innocence and should not be convicted unless the evidence is sufficient to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and to a moral certainty. To be noted, however, is the difference in the tests of the sufficiency of the evidence at different stages of a prosecution in a criminal case. Proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in the minds of the jury is essential to a conviction. For the submission of the case to a jury, there must be substantial evidence tending to prove all elements of the crime, a mere scintilla not being sufficient. Ex parte Grimmett, 228 Ala. 1, 152 So. 263; Moore v. State, 52 Ala.App. 394, 293 So.2d 309 (1974); Lloyd v. State, 50 Ala.App. 646, 282 So.2d 85 (1973); Ford v. State, 50 Ala.App. 343, 279 So.2d 146, cert....

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Lehr v. State, 7 Div. 680
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • May 5, 1981
    ...to a determination of whether there was substantial evidence presented to support all the elements of the crime charged. West v. State, 57 Ala.App. 596, 329 So.2d 653, cert. den. 295 Ala. 427, 329 So.2d 658 (1976). In the instant case the evidence was sufficient to sustain the ruling of the......
  • Ladd v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • October 3, 1978
    ...connecting the appellant with the automobile in any fashion was the fingerprints. Judge Clark, speaking for this court in West v. State, 57 Ala.App. 596, 329 So.2d 653, cert. denied, 295 Ala. 427, 329 So.2d 658 (1976), ". . . Proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in the minds of the jury......
  • Thompson v. State, 4 Div. 881
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • June 23, 1981
  • Fulgham v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • August 27, 1999
    ...must be substantial evidence tending to prove all the elements of the crime, a mere scintilla not being sufficient." West v. State, 57 Ala.App. 596, 599, 329 So.2d 653, cert. denied, 295 Ala. 427, 329 So.2d 658 "A person commits the crime of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT