West v. West
Decision Date | 16 June 1930 |
Docket Number | 607-N. |
Citation | 153 S.E. 600,199 N.C. 12 |
Parties | WEST v. WEST. |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Appeal from Superior Court, Buncombe County; MacRae, Special Judge.
Divorce action by Mildred T. West against Martin H. West. Plaintiff obtained a divorce absolute against defendant, and a judgment was rendered that defendant pay $25 per month for support of minor son. Plaintiff made an affidavit to effect that defendant had failed to pay such support money, and defendant was held in contempt of court, and he appeals.
Reversed.
The plaintiff and defendant were married on May 22, 1920, and lived together as man and wife until July 8, 1928. They had one son, Martin H. West, Jr., born May 17, 1921. The plaintiff obtained a divorce absolute against the defendant and he has married again.
A judgment was rendered by Finley, J., to which the defendant made no exception, as follows: It is "Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed by the Court that the defendant pay to the plaintiff for the maintenance and support of said minor Martin H. West, Jr., the sum of $25.00 per month, the first payment to be made on December 15, 1929, and $25.00 to be paid on the 15th of each month thereafter, said payments to be made to the Clerk of the Superior Court for Buncombe County, North Carolina."
The plaintiff made an affidavit in the cause and, among other things, is the following:
The cause came on for hearing before Judge C. F. MacRae, Judge Presiding. The plaintiff introduced no evidence. The defendant testified, in part:
On cross-examination, he stated that his wife obtained an absolute divorce. That he married again on November 30, 1929, and is living with his wife, who is a nurse and she works when she can get employment, but at present the demand for nursing is quiet and she is getting very little to do. He is 29 years of age and in good health and suffering from no physical disability. At May term, 1922, of the superior court of Buncombe county, he was ordered to pay $40 a month for the support of his wife and child. That he was cited for failure to comply with the former judgment. He further testified:
S. D West, the father of defendant, testified: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Shipman
... ... be restricted to such acts done with an unlawful ... intent." State v. Falkner, 182 N.C. 793, 108 ... S.E. 756, 17 A. L. R. 986; West v. West, 199 N.C ... 12, 153 S.E. 600 ... "Corruption," ... Black, supra, at page 277, citing authorities: ... "Illegality; ... ...
-
State v. Dickens
...642, 83 S.E. 702; State v. Falkner, 182 N.C. 793, 108 S.E. 756, 17 A.L.R. 986; Foster v. Hyman, 197 N.C. 189, 148 S.E. 36; West v. West, 199 N.C. 12, 153 S.E. 600. Wilful means "without just cause, excuse, justification," State v. Yelverton, 196 N.C. 64, 144 S.E. 534, 535. The exclusion of ......
-
Peeler v. Peeler
...to pay the sums agreed upon for the support and maintenance of the children, could be indicted under C. S. § 4447. See West v. West, 199 N.C. 12, 153 S.E. 600. again, the entire paper writings indicate a continuing guaranty. Lewis v. Dwight, 10 Conn. 95; Hickory Novelty Co. v. Andrews, 188 ......
-
In re Hege
... ... purpose and object of the contemnor, and the judgment must be ... founded on these findings. In re Odum, 133 N.C. 250, ... 45 S.E. 569; West v. West, 199 N.C. 12, 153 S.E ... Contempt ... proceeding is criminal in its nature, and must be construed ... strictly ... ...