West v. West, 57305
| Decision Date | 29 April 1982 |
| Docket Number | No. 57305,57305 |
| Citation | 414 So.2d 189 |
| Parties | Virginia WEST, Petitioner, v. Richard B. WEST, Respondent. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Richard H. Langley, Clermont, for petitioner.
Arthur E. Roberts, Groveland, for respondent.
Elizabeth S. Baker, Miami, for Legal Services of Greater Miami, Inc.
Patricia Ireland, Miami, and Julia Dawson, North Miami, for Nat. Organization for Women in Florida and Florida Now.
Judith Bass, Miami, for Florida Ass'n of Women Lawyers.
Frances M. Farina, Miami Shores, for Florida Women's Political Caucus.
Roberta Fox of Gold & Fox, Coral Gables, H. Jack Klingensmith of Kuvin, Klingensmith & Lewis, South Miami, and Spencer Fox, Miami, for Cassandra Newby.
Bruce Rogow, Fort Lauderdale, for American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Florida.
H. Jack Klingensmith of Kuvin, Klingensmith and Lewis, and Spencer Fox, Miami for Dade County Advocate for Victims, Miami, and Forum, University of Miami, School of Law, Coral Gables, on brief for amicus curiae.
Petitioner, Virginia West, sued her former husband, Richard B. West, alleging that during their marriage the husband intentionally injured her by throwing her to the floor, causing a triple fracture of her left ankle. The trial court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a cause of action on the ground of interspousal tort immunity. She appealed to the Second District Court of Appeal which affirmed the trial court's dismissal and certified to us, pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution (1972), the following question:
WHETHER A FORMER SPOUSE CAN MAINTAIN AN ACTION IN TORT AGAINST THE OTHER SPOUSE FOR AN INTENTIONAL TORT ALLEGEDLY COMMITTED DURING MARRIAGE WHERE SUCH MARRIAGE HAS SINCE BEEN DISSOLVED BY DIVORCE.
West v. West, 372 So.2d 170, 172 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).
In Hill v. Hill, No. 59,891, 415 So.2d 20 (Fla. April 29, 1982), we have answered the question in the negative. However, we emphasized that, where an intentional tort has occurred, the trial court in a subsequent dissolution proceeding has the authority
to direct the offending spouse to pay the necessary medical expenses not covered by insurance and the ... authority to consider any permanent injury, disfigurement, or loss of earning capacity caused by an intentional tort in establishing appropriate alimony under section 61.08, [Florida Statutes 1979] particularly that provision which provides "the court may consider any other factor necessary to do equity and...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Luna v. Clayton
...... See Hill v. Hill, 415 So.2d 20 (Fla.1982) and West v. West, 414 So.2d 189 (Fla.1982); Robeson v. International Indemnity Co., 248 Ga. 306, 282 S.E.2d ......
-
Waite v. Waite, 89-868
...So.2d 190 (Fla.1982), we question whether that rule remains viable after Sturiano. 2 Appellee argues that the earlier case of West v. West, 414 So.2d 189 (Fla.1982), bars Mrs. Waite's action. Mrs. West alleged that she sustained a triple fracture of her left ankle when her husband intention......
-
Siegel v. Siegel
...or physical disability. See generally, Noah v. Noah, 491 So.2d 1124 (Fla.1986); Hill v. Hill, 415 So.2d 20 (Fla.1982); 5 West v. West, 414 So.2d 189 (Fla.1982). Reprehensible conduct by a former spouse is not a sufficient basis, standing alone, to justify the award of permanent alimony in a......
-
Mosbarger v. Mosbarger
...more severely in this domestic proceeding. § 61.08(1), Fla.Stat. (1987); Noah v. Noah, 491 So.2d 1124 (Fla.1986). See also West v. West, 414 So.2d 189 (Fla.1982) (intentional tort claim barred by interspousal immunity, but divorce court may consider economic damages caused by the intentiona......