West, Weir & Bartel, Inc. v. Mary Carter Paint Company

Decision Date09 April 1970
Parties, 259 N.E.2d 483 WEST, WEIR & BARTEL, INC., Respondent, v. MARY CARTER PAINT COMPANY, Appellant.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Appeal from Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, 31 A.D.2d 517, 294 N.Y.S.2d 837.

Advertising agency brought action against manufacturer for alleged breach of advertising contract.

The Supreme Court, Special and Trial Term, New York County, granted limited judgment to the advertising agency, and cross-appeals were taken.

The Appellate Division, 25 A.D.2d 81, 267 N.Y.S.2d 29, modified and remanded.

On appeal after remand the Appellate Division, 31 A.D.2d 517, 294 N.Y.S.2d 837, affirmed judgment entered on remand in favor of the advertising agency by the Trial Term. Appeal was taken to the Court of Appeals.

The Court of Appeals, 25 N.Y.2d 535, 307 N.Y.S.2d 449, 255 N.E.2d 709, modified and, as modified, affirmed.

Motion was made in the Court of Appeals to amend the remittitur.

Motion to amend the remittitur granted and the remittitur amended to read, as follows: 'Order modified in accordance with the opinion herein and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs in all courts.'

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Levine v. Advest, Inc.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • May 26, 1998
    ...Inc. v. Mary Carter Paint Co., 25 N.Y.2d 535, 540, 255 N.E.2d 709, 307 N.Y.S.2d 449 (1969), amended on other grounds, 26 N.Y.2d 969, 259 N.E.2d 483, 311 N.Y.S.2d 13 (1970); accord Lawson v. Whitey's Frame Shop, 241 Conn. 678, 686, 697 A.2d 1137 (1997); Levine v. Massey, supra, 232 Conn. at ......
  • Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. v. Rhodes
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • September 29, 2008
    ...v. Mary Carter Paint Co., 25 N.Y.2d 535, 540, 307 N.Y.S.2d 449, 255 N.E.2d 709 (1969), modified on other grounds, 26 N.Y.2d 969, 311 N.Y.S.2d 13, 259 N.E.2d 483 (1970). If the language of the contract is ambiguous, however, extrinsic evidence of the parties' intent is admissible. Space Imag......
  • Times Mirror Magazines v. Field & Stream Licenses
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • June 30, 2000
    ...v. Mary Carter Paint Co., 25 N.Y.2d 535, 540, 307 N.Y.S.2d 449, 255 N.E.2d 709 (1969), modified on other grounds, 26 N.Y.2d 969, 311 N.Y.S.2d 13, 259 N.E.2d 483 (1970). If the language of a contract is ambiguous, however, extrinsic evidence of the parties' intent is admissible. Space Imagin......
  • Phibro Energy v. Empresa De Polimeros De Sines Sarl
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • August 28, 1989
    ...Carter Paint Co., 25 N.Y.2d 535, 540, 307 N.Y.S.2d 449, 452, 255 N.E.2d 709, 712 (1969), modified on other grounds, 26 N.Y.2d 969, 311 N.Y.S.2d 13, 259 N.E.2d 483 (1970). On the other hand, where the language of a contract is "`susceptible of at least two fairly reasonable interpretations, ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT