Wester v. State

Decision Date16 January 1940
Citation141 Fla. 374,193 So. 303
PartiesWESTER v. STATE.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

En Banc.

Error to Circuit Court, Jackson County; Ira A. Hutchison, Judge.

Ralph Wester was convicted of murder in the first degree, and he brings error.

Affirmed.

COUNSEL Amos E. Lewis, of Marianna, and Philip D. Beall, of Pensacola, for plaintiff in error.

George Couper Gibbs, Atty. Gen., and Thomas J. Ellis, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

OPINION

THOMAS, Justice.

This is a companion to the case of Woodrow Wester v. State, Fla., 193 So. 300, decided this day, and what we said in that opinion disposes of all questions raised here except one criticizing a charge of the court defining principals in the first and second degree. (That part of the opinion in the other case which dealt with threats said to have been made by Woodrow Wester against the deceased is, of course, irrelevant to this one.)

The questioned instruction was: 'A principal in the first degree and a principal in the second degree are both principals, and are punishable alike. The degrees are designed merely to indicate that one actually committed the felonious act, and that the other was present (actually or constructively) aiding and abetting the felonious act. Both are equally guilty; and it is not material which one is alleged to have actually committed the felonious act, [if] it is duly proven that one committed the act and that the other was present, and aided and abetted the alleged felony.'

That the charge is correct is evident from reading the following cases: Pope v. State, 84 Fla. 428, 94 So. 865; Bryan v. State, 19 Fla. 864; and Neumann v. State, 116 Fla. 98, 156 So. 237.

No error could have resulted from failure to define 'constructively', as is urged. It is not incumbent upon the court to define words, used in the charges, which are understandable to persons possessed of the qualifications required of jurors; there was no request for the definitive instruction; and the evidence shows that this plaintiff in error was parked so near the victim's home and the scene of the murder that the report of the gun was heard by him.

The judgment is affirmed.

TERRELL, C.J., and WHITFIELD, BUFORD, and CHAPMAN, JJ., concur.

BROWN, J., not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Jimenez v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • April 8, 1947
    ... ... the fact, by counseling, hiring, or otherwise procuring such ... felony to be committed, shall be punished in the same manner ... prescribed for the punishment of the principal felony.' ... See Albritton v. State, 32 Fla. 358, 13 So. 955; ... Wester v. [158 Fla. 729] State, 141 Fla ... 374, 193 So. 303; Neumann v. State, 116 Fla. 98, 156 ... So. 237 and Pope v. State, 84 Fla. 428, 94 So. 865; ... Ferguson v. State and Maxwell v. State, Fla., 28 ... So.2d 427; Warren on Homicide, Vol. 2, page 135; State v ... Payne, 10 Wash. 545, 39P ... ...
  • Scheel v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 18, 1977
    ...'implied consent'. Danford v. State, 53 Fla. 4, 43 So. 593 (1907); Lindberg v. State, 134 Fla. 786, 184 So. 662 (1938); Wester v. State, 141 Fla. 374, 193 So. 303 (1940); State v. Bryan, 287 So.2d 73 We need not further discuss the first point. The second point, which raises the sufficiency......
  • Ralston v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 20, 1977
    ..."implied consent". Danford v. State, 53 Fla. 4, 43 So. 593 (1907); Lindberg v. State, 134 Fla. 786, 184 So. 662 (1938); Wester v. State, 141 Fla. 374, 193 So. 303 (1940); State v. Bryan, 287 So.2d 73 As to the last point, the prosecutrix' testimony alone (which was obviously believed by the......
  • Vaughn-griffin Packing Co. v. Fisher
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • January 19, 1940
    ... ... such circumstances it is unnecessary for the court to offer a ... definition to the jury. See Ralph Wester v. State, ... Fla., 193 So. 303, decided this term ... As we ... have observed, the fruit which was to be purchased under the ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT