Westerbeke v. Reynolds
Decision Date | 13 October 1944 |
Parties | WESTERBEKE v. REYNOLDS. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; M. B. Smith Judge.
G. P Garrett and H. N. Roth, both of Orlando, for appellant.
Giles & Gurney, of Orlando, for appellee.
Appellant here was plaintiff in the court below and in her amended declaration alleged,
'(a) On to-wit, April 3, A.D.1940, the plaintiff sustained physical injuries by and through the negligence of the defendant, as follows:
Demurrer to this declaration was sustained; plaintiff suffered judgment and appealed.
It will be observed that the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Brant v. Van Zandt
...The defendant relies for reversal upon the authority of such cases as Breau v. Whitmore, Fla.1952, 59 So.2d 748; Westerbeke v. Reynolds, 1944, 155 Fla. 2, 19 So.2d 413; and Norman v. Shulman, 1942, 150 Fla. 142, 7 So.2d 98. The plaintiff contends that the judgment should be affirmed upon th......
-
Ortner v. Linch, 60-23
...Taneian v. Meghrigian, 15 N.J. 267, 104 A.2d 689.4 The earlier cases of Norman v. Shulman, 150 Fla. 142, 7 So.2d 98, and Westerbeke v. Reynolds, 155 Fla. 2, 19 So.2d 413, which involved claims of guests of apartment house tenants for alleged failure to properly maintain common exists, were ......
-
Feigen v. Sokolsky
...in this case. The doctrine laid down in the case of Norman v Shulman, supra, was re-affirmed in the case of Westerbeke v. Reynolds, 155 Fla. 2, 19 So.2d 413, 414, where the Court specifically held that the owner of a building was not liable for injury received "when she fell in leaving unli......
-
City of Palatka v. Woods
...existed, he is guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. Breau v. Whitmore, supra (Fla., 59 So.2d 748); Westerbeke v. Reynolds, supra (155 Fla. 2, 19 So.2d 413); Norman v. Shulman, supra (150 Fla. 142, 7 So.2d 98). See also Nussbaum v. Sovereign Hotel Corp., Fla., 1954, 72 So.2d......