Western & A. It. Co v. Vaughan At Al

Decision Date27 April 1901
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court
PartiesWESTERN & A. It. CO. v. VAUGHAN at al.

WITNESS—IMPEACHMENT—RAILROADS— NEGLIGENCE.

1. A witness cannot be impeached by proving association with a man of bad character.

2. Upon the trial of an action against a railroad company for personal injuries, it was error for the court to charge that certain facts would constitute negligence on the part of the defendant; the facts stated not being such as are made by law to constitute negligence per se. Railway Co. v. Bryant, 34 S. E. 350, 110 Ga. 247.

3. The standard of decision for ordinary diligence or negligence is what an ordinarily prudent man would do under the same circumstances, and not what the injured person thought was proper, or did in good faith. Harris v. Railroad Co., 3 S. E. 355, 78 Ga. 536; Coleman v. Allen, 5 S. E. 204, 79 Ga. 637; Cotton-Oil Co. v. Jackson, 37 S. E. 873, 112 Ga. 620.

4. Other than as herein indicated, there was no material error in any of the rulings of which complaint was made.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Error from superior court, Catoosa county; A. W. Fite, Judge.

Action by Carrie Vaughan and others against the Western & Atlantic Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error. Reversed.

Payne & Tye and R. J. & J. McCamy, for plaintiff in error.

O. T. Ladson and Shumate & Maddox, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment reversed.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT