Western & A.R. Co. v. Williams
Decision Date | 19 October 1916 |
Docket Number | 29. |
Citation | 90 S.E. 478,146 Ga. 27 |
Parties | WESTERN & A. R. CO. v. WILLIAMS. |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court.
Under the decision in the case of City of Tallapoosa v. Brock, 143 Ga. 599, 85 S.E. 755, a direct bill of exceptions will not lie to a judgment overruling a plea in abatement to a suit brought for the recovery of damages for personal injuries, which is the case presented by this record.
Error from Superior Court, Whitfield County; A. W. Fite, Judge.
Action by Edwin Williams, by next friend, against the Western & Atlantic Railroad Company. There was a judgment overruling its plea in abatement, and defendant brings error. Writ dismissed.
Tye, Peeples & Jordan, of Atlanta, and Maddox, McCamy & Shumate, of Dalton, for plaintiff in error.
W. C. Martin and W. E. Mann, both of Dalton, for defendant in error.
Writ of error dismissed.
All the Justices concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Peerless Laundry Co. v. Abraham
... ... judgment is not final. City of Tallapoosa v. Brock, ... 143 Ga. 599, 85 S.E. 755; Western & Atlantic R. Co. v ... Williams, 146 Ga. 27, 90 S.E. 478; English v ... Rosenkrantz, 150 Ga ... ...