Western Union Tel Co v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Decision Date | 22 October 1888 |
Citation | 9 S.Ct. 6,32 L.Ed. 345,128 U.S. 39 |
Parties | WESTERN UNION TEL. CO. v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
M. E. Olmsted, for plaintiff in error.
John F. Sanderson and W. S. Kirkpatrick, for defendant in error.
Judgment was rendered against plaintiff in error for taxes on telegraphic messages sent from point to point within the state of Pennsylvania, on messages sent from points within the state to points in other states, on messages sent from points in other states to points within the state, and on messages sent to and from points in other states which passed over lines partly within the state; and the record discloses the several amounts of taxes upon the several classes of messages, which, with commissions and interest, make up the total recovery. It is clear, and this is conceded by the defend- ant in error, that, under the decisions of this court in Telegraph Co. v. Texas, 105 U. S. 460, and Ratterman v. Telegraph Co., 127 U. S. 411, 8 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1127, the commonwealth was not entitled to recover for the taxes in question, excepting in respect to the messages transmitted wholly within the state. The judgment will therefore be reversed, and the cause remanded for such further proceedings as justice may require. Ordered accordingly.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Crescent Cotton Oil Co. v. State ex rel. Collins
... ... 274; ... Pensacola Telegraph Company v. Western Union Telegraph ... Company, 96 U.S. 1, 24 L.Ed. 708; Western Union ... Com. Rep. 45; Crew ... Levick Company v. Pennsylvania, 245 U.S. , 62 L.Ed. 264 ... (B) ... That a corporation ... 328, 52 ... L.Ed. 230; Express Company v. Commonwealth, 214 U.S ... 218, 53 L.Ed. 972; Railroad Company v. Husen, 95 U.S. 465, ... ...
-
Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. Davidson
...268, 360, 39 L. Ed. 311; Western Union Tel. Co. v. Alabama, 132 U. S. 477, 10 Sup. Ct. 161, 33 L. Ed. 409; Western Union Tel. Co. v. Penn., 128 U. S. 39, 9 Sup. Ct. 6, 32 L. Ed. 345; Allen v. Pullman Co., 191 U. S. 171, 24 Sup. Ct. 39, 48 L. Ed. 134; Caldwell v. North Carolina, 187 U. S. 62......
-
Western Union Telegraph Company v. City of Fremont
... ... named, would be invalid? Clearly it would be, if the tax in ... the case at bar cannot be sustained ... In ... Commonwealth v. Stodder , 56 Mass. 562, 2 Cush. 562, ... cited in the brief of counsel for plaintiff in error, the ... opinion of the court contains language ... will not be repugnant to the constitution of the United ... States." To the same effect is Western Union ... Telegraph Co. v. Pennsylvania , 128 U.S. 39, 32 L.Ed ... 345, 9 S.Ct. 6 ... In ... Leloup v. Port of Mobile , 127 U.S. 640, 32 L.Ed ... 311, 8 S.Ct ... ...
-
The Katie
... ... ports and places in the other states of the Union, and to and ... from foreign ports. The libel contains the usual ... 232. ' There a statutory ... tax of Pennsylvania of two cents for one class, three cents ... for another, and five cents ... Head, at the western extremity of Martha's Vineyard; and ... it was insisted by respondents to ... ...