Westinghouse Elec. Corp. v. Childs-Bellows

Decision Date08 December 1961
Docket NumberNo. 16258,CHILDS-BELLOW,A,16258
Citation352 S.W.2d 806
PartiesWESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, Appellant, v.ppellee.
CourtTexas Court of Appeals

Leachman, Gardere, Akin & Porter, and Gordon H. Rowe, Jr., Dallas, for appellant.

Spurlock, Schattman & Jacobs, and Kenneth M. Cole, Jr., Fort Worth, for appellee.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

RENFRO, Justice.

The appellant's motion for rehearing is granted and our opinion of November 3, 1961, is hereby withdrawn.

The question before us is whether the trial court erred in holding that Childs-Bellows was entitled to indemnity from Westinghouse Electric Corporation.

The case was tried before the court on the pleadings and written stipulations only.

The appellee, Childs-Bellows, was general contractor for the construction of a new building for the First National Bank in Fort Worth. Appellant, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, was subcontractor for installation of elevators in the building. Childs-Bellows and Westinghouse entered into a written contract which provided in part:

'1. Statement of the Work:

'* * *

'(b) Subcontractor shall furnish all of the labor, material and equipment necessary to accomplish the following (hereinafter referred to as 'the Work'):

'High Rise Elevators 1 to 6 inclusive and all of the Escalators, all in accordance with the requirements of the Plans and Specifications for the sum of $600,858.00.

'* * *

'6. Indemnity Agreements.

'* * *

'(b) Subcontractor agrees to perform the Work in a good and workmanlike manner and in accordance with the provisions of the General Contract, and with the provisions of this Subcontract and in accordance with all safety rules and regulations set forth in the General Contract, or issued by Contractor, and in accordance with any and all laws, rules or regulations issued by any governmental authority having the authority to control the manner or method of carrying out the Work. Subcontractor further agrees that if the property of any person, firm or corporation, including that of Contractor, is lost, damaged, or destroyed while on the job site and such loss, damage or destruction is caused by, results from, or arises out of, the doing, or the method or manner of performance of the Work, or, is due to or results from, or arises out of, the failure of Subcontractor to do, or Subcontractor's omission to do, anything in connection with the Work, or required by this Subcontract, Subcontractor shall indemnify and save harmless Contractor from any and all such loss, damage or destruction. Subcontractor further agrees to and shall indemnify and save harmless Contractor from and against any and all loss, claim, demand, and suit for damage, including death and personal injury, growing out of, or incident to or resulting from the performance, or failure to perform the Work or the provisions of this Subcontract.' (Emphasis supplied.)

During the course of the Work, two employees of Westinghouse, in separate accidents, while in the course and scope of their employment, in furtherance of the Work, were injured as result of being struck by falling objects. Both were working inside an elevator shaft when injured. The injuries were the results of negligence on the part of employees of Childs-Bellows. Both injured...

To continue reading

Request your trial
25 cases
  • Armstrong v. Chambers & Kennedy
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Texas
    • March 7, 1972
    ...Oil & Ref. Co. v. Wilson, 339 S.W.2d 954 (Tex.Civ.App. — Waco, 1960, writ ref'd, n.r.e.); Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Childs-Bellows, 352 S.W.2d 806 (Tex.Civ.App. — Ft. Worth, 1962, writ ref'd)." DEI must also respond for the subcontractor indemnity clause because it breached its contrac......
  • Joe Adams and Son v. McCann Const. Co.
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • October 6, 1971
    ...the Texas decisions in Standard Oil Co. of Texas v. Wampler, 218 F.2d 768 (5th Cir. 1955); Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Childs-Bellows, 352 S.W.2d 806 (Tex.Civ.App.--Fort Worth 1961, writ ref'd); Crews Well Service v. Texas Company, 358 S.W.2d 171 (Tex.Civ.App.--San Antonio 1962, writ ref......
  • American Agric. Chem. Co. v. Tampa Armature Works
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • April 4, 1963
    ...still another agency — the Supreme Court — speaks. Incidentally all had difficulty with the case of Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Childs-Bellows, Tex.Civ.App., 1961, 352 S.W.2d 806, writ ref., which bears much resemblance to this Florida 9 Oddly enough, in the illustration of a uniform, si......
  • Dupre v. Penrod Drilling Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • June 17, 1993
    ...Minatome at 19 (citing Sun Oil Co. v. Renshaw Well Serv., Inc., 571 S.W.2d 64 (Tex.App.--Tyler 1978, no writ) and Westinghouse Elec. Corp. v. Childs-Bellows, 352 S.W.2d 806 (Tex.App.--Fort Worth 1961, no writ)). We disagree. The cases Minatome cites stand for the proposition that an indemni......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT