Westinghouse Elec. Corp. v. Childs-Bellows
Decision Date | 08 December 1961 |
Docket Number | No. 16258,CHILDS-BELLOW,A,16258 |
Citation | 352 S.W.2d 806 |
Parties | WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, Appellant, v.ppellee. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Leachman, Gardere, Akin & Porter, and Gordon H. Rowe, Jr., Dallas, for appellant.
Spurlock, Schattman & Jacobs, and Kenneth M. Cole, Jr., Fort Worth, for appellee.
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
The appellant's motion for rehearing is granted and our opinion of November 3, 1961, is hereby withdrawn.
The question before us is whether the trial court erred in holding that Childs-Bellows was entitled to indemnity from Westinghouse Electric Corporation.
The case was tried before the court on the pleadings and written stipulations only.
The appellee, Childs-Bellows, was general contractor for the construction of a new building for the First National Bank in Fort Worth. Appellant, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, was subcontractor for installation of elevators in the building. Childs-Bellows and Westinghouse entered into a written contract which provided in part:
'1. Statement of the Work:
'* * *
'(b) Subcontractor shall furnish all of the labor, material and equipment necessary to accomplish the following (hereinafter referred to as 'the Work'):
'High Rise Elevators 1 to 6 inclusive and all of the Escalators, all in accordance with the requirements of the Plans and Specifications for the sum of $600,858.00.
'* * *
'6. Indemnity Agreements.
'* * *
(Emphasis supplied.)
During the course of the Work, two employees of Westinghouse, in separate accidents, while in the course and scope of their employment, in furtherance of the Work, were injured as result of being struck by falling objects. Both were working inside an elevator shaft when injured. The injuries were the results of negligence on the part of employees of Childs-Bellows. Both injured...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Armstrong v. Chambers & Kennedy
...Oil & Ref. Co. v. Wilson, 339 S.W.2d 954 (Tex.Civ.App. — Waco, 1960, writ ref'd, n.r.e.); Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Childs-Bellows, 352 S.W.2d 806 (Tex.Civ.App. — Ft. Worth, 1962, writ ref'd)." DEI must also respond for the subcontractor indemnity clause because it breached its contrac......
-
Joe Adams and Son v. McCann Const. Co.
...the Texas decisions in Standard Oil Co. of Texas v. Wampler, 218 F.2d 768 (5th Cir. 1955); Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Childs-Bellows, 352 S.W.2d 806 (Tex.Civ.App.--Fort Worth 1961, writ ref'd); Crews Well Service v. Texas Company, 358 S.W.2d 171 (Tex.Civ.App.--San Antonio 1962, writ ref......
-
American Agric. Chem. Co. v. Tampa Armature Works
...still another agency — the Supreme Court — speaks. Incidentally all had difficulty with the case of Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Childs-Bellows, Tex.Civ.App., 1961, 352 S.W.2d 806, writ ref., which bears much resemblance to this Florida 9 Oddly enough, in the illustration of a uniform, si......
-
Dupre v. Penrod Drilling Corp.
...Minatome at 19 (citing Sun Oil Co. v. Renshaw Well Serv., Inc., 571 S.W.2d 64 (Tex.App.--Tyler 1978, no writ) and Westinghouse Elec. Corp. v. Childs-Bellows, 352 S.W.2d 806 (Tex.App.--Fort Worth 1961, no writ)). We disagree. The cases Minatome cites stand for the proposition that an indemni......