Westinghouse Elec. Corp. v. Shafer & Miller, Inc.

Decision Date25 August 1987
Docket NumberNo. 86-2193,86-2193
Citation12 Fla. L. Weekly 2066,515 So.2d 248
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals
Parties12 Fla. L. Weekly 2066 WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, Appellant, v. SHAFER & MILLER, INC. and American Home Assurance Company, Appellees.

Finley, Kumble, Wagner, Heine, Underberg, Manley, Myerson & Casey and Jeffrey A. O'Keefe, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Rosenberg, Reisman & Glass and James Glass and Michael L. Dennis, Miami, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court, having determined that Shafer & Miller, Inc. had tendered an offer of settlement to Westinghouse Electric Corporation in an amount greater than the verdict subsequently returned by a jury, correctly held that Westinghouse was not entitled to attorney's fees as a prevailing party under section 627.428, Florida Statutes (1985). See Greenough v. Aetna Casualty & Sur. Co., 449 So.2d 1001 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); cf. C.U. Assocs., Inc. v. R.B. Grove, Inc., 472 So.2d 1177 (Fla.1985) (construing section 713.29, Florida Statutes (1981)). As the remaining points presented do not merit discussion, the judgment under review is affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Baker Protective Services v. FP Inc.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 19, 1995
    ...the insured's recovery must be greater than the highest valid offer of settlement made by the insurer. Westinghouse Elec. Corp. v. Shafer & Miller, Inc., 515 So.2d 248 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), review denied, 525 So.2d 881 (Fla.1988); accord Danis Indus. Corp. v. Ground Improvement Techniques, In......
  • Danis Industries Corp. v. Ground Imp. Techniques, Inc.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 23, 1993
    ...in an amount which is greater than any offer of settlement previously tendered by the insurer. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Shafer & Miller, Inc., 515 So.2d 248 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), rev. denied, 525 So.2d 881 (Fla.1988); Greenough v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 449 So.2d 1001 (Fla. 4th DC......
  • Willey v. M.K. Roark, Inc.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • April 14, 1993
    ...attorney prosecuting the suit in which recovery is had ...2 We note that appellee's reliance on Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Shafer & Miller, Inc., 515 So.2d 248 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), is misplaced. That case relies on Greenough v. Aetna Cas. & Surety Co., 449 So.2d 1001 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984),......
  • Westinghouse Elec. Corp. v. Shafer & Miller, Inc.
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • March 15, 1988
    ...Corporation v. Shafer & Miller, Inc., American Home Assurance Co. NO. 71,684 Supreme Court of Florida. MAR 15, 1988 Appeal From: 3d DCA 515 So.2d 248 Rev. ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT